Bar&Bench News Network
The Delhi High Court has allowed Anil Nanda's application to implead Fortis Healthcare in the dispute with his brother, Rajan Nanda. The Malvinder Singh-promoted healthcare major is now a party to the bitter dispute pending since 2005.
The Anil and Rajan Nanda-owned Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre was sold to Fortis Healthcare for approximately Rs. 556 crore ($ 115 Million) in 2005. Fortis Healthcare entered the capital markets in 2007 and raised Rs. 500 Crores ($104 Million) through an IPO. One of the risk factors included in the Fortis IPO prospectus was the existence of the dispute with Anil Nanda.
Anil Nanda has argued before the Court that the public offer of Fortis Healthcare should be declared illegal on the grounds that the Escorts Heart Institute is under dispute. Nanda's petition seeking a declaration of the 2007 Fortis IPO as illegal has been admitted.
The amended petition also asks the Court to declare the transfer of 90 per cent of the shares to Fortis Healthcare, as void and bad in law and prays for a quashing of the arrangement between Rajan and Escorts.
Anil's counsel, P.K. Bansal has engaged Senior Advocate Sandeep Sethi to appear in this segment of the long drawn litigation. Senior Counsels V.P. Singh and Mukul Rohtagi have also previously been engaged to appear on behalf of Anil Nanda at various points of time. The Escorts hospital, Rajan Nanda and other parties to the dispute have been represented by Senior Counsels A.M.Singhvi and Parag P.Tripathi. The matter is due for hearing on October 15.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- Justice Katju's recusal brings RIL-BPCL dispute back to square one after six years in SC
- Clifford Chance dispute with IT department reaches Supreme Court - SC issues notice to Clifford Chance after AG appears
- Dispute of the day: Scrabble, Snake & Ladder, Monopoly are games - Supreme Court
- "Gas not your private property"- Government to Ambani brothers
- Recusals hit Delhi High Court: Justice Mudgal inherits HUL shares, recuses from HLL - Reckitt dispute
- Kingfisher - CCI dispute heats up - ELP and AG for CCI; Bachubhai for Kingfisher
- Legislation spree: UPA govt to moot bills for judges, corporate disputes, foreign universities and HIV/AIDS patients
Other News
- Significant amendments proposed to Consumer Protection Act; Online filing to be made permissible, fines for non-compliance enhanced
- ALMT Legal gets four new partners; Total partner strength increases to 18
- Clasis Law gets third new partner in as many months; Maritime law expert Harsh Pratap roped in to head Shipping practice
- Foreign Law Firms Case: Arguments concluded; Judgment reserved
- Conversation with Kartikeya Tanna: “What Vineet Narain and Justice Singhvi have done, Justice Ganguly has undone”
- NALSAR hit by another scandal; Committee finds NALSAR authorities guilty of gross abuse of power (Updated)
- AIBE Update: Results withheld due to Cal High Court injunction; BCI to approach Supreme Court
The Viewpoint - Market Structure and Competitive Bidding
Jan 31, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the seventh article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner J. Sagar Associates. JSA Partners Amit Kapur and Vishnu Sudarsan analyse the recent judgment of Appellate Tribunal for Electricity in the Essar Power case which has clarified the position re. competitive procurement of power. comments (0)










