Section 30 of Advocates Act 1961 to be notified soon Lawyers will be able to practice in all courts | Bar and Bench

Section 30 of Advocates Act 1961 to be notified soon Lawyers will be able to practice in all courts

The Central Government has finally decided to notify Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (the Act) which will as a matter of right allow lawyers to practice in any court, tribunal or any quasi judicial authority all over India. This will allow lawyers to practice in all courts across India irrespective of which bar council they are enrolled in or without the need or condition to transfer the bar licence to the state where they want to practice in.

The Central Government has finally decided to notify Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (the Act) which will as a matter of right allow lawyers to practice in any court, tribunal or any quasi judicial authority all over India. This will allow lawyers to practice in all courts across India irrespective of which bar council they are enrolled in or without the need or condition to transfer the bar licence to the state where they want to practice in.

 

Section 30 of the Advocates Act provides: “Right of advocates to practice: Subject to the provisions of this Act, every advocate shall be entitled as of right to practise throughout the territories to which this Act extends; in all courts including the Supreme Court; before any tribunal or person legally authorised to take evidence; and before any other authority or person before whom such advocate is by or under any law for the time being in force entitled to practice”.

 

Advocates for the last so many years have been claiming the right to practice in all courts as of right and have been agitating for the enforcement of Section 30 of the Act in this behalf. Almost 50 years have passed since enactment of the Act, the provision has not been brought into force.

 

Earlier, the Supreme Court in Aeltemesh Rein vs. Union of India and others [AIR 1988 SC 1768] had issued a writ of mandamus to the Central Government to consider, within six months, whether Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 should be brought into force or not. The Court, however, held that it was the discretion of the Central Government to bring this section in force by issuing a notification in this behalf.

 

In spite of the direction of the Supreme Court, the section has not been brought in force till date and hence advocates cannot practice as of right.

 

Recently, a delegation of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry (BCTNP) headed by Prabhakaran Vice-Chairman of BCTNP had met the Union Law Minister Veerappa Moily and impressed on him the need for notifying Section 30 of the Act to allow advocates to practice in all fora. Moily assured them that the government had already taken a decision in this regard and the notification was to be issued shortly, according to media reports.

 

According to Hindu, Veerappa Moily informed that the long-pending demands of the lawyers had been conceded, and he had passed appropriate orders for notifying this Section early next week.

 

Moily said, “I traced the file relating to this provision. For some reasons this Section remained in the Statute without being notified. I decided to notify this Section and signed necessary orders. The notification is expected to be issued either on June 7 or 8”.

 

Now, we have to wait and watch when the provision will be finally notified.

 

Category: 

Comments

k s prabhakaran

June 7, 2011 - 5:48am

Congrates to Honourable Veerappamoily, for having pumped fresh blood to SEc.30 of Advocates ACt a greata job for having the searched the pending file a comendable one! He is a good lawyer !

  • 0
  • 0

k.s.prabhakaran

June 14, 2011 - 7:19am

I hope the notification on of this section entail render insignificant the status of 'Supreme Court Advocate on Record'? "

  • 0
  • 0

Satyendra kumar...

June 14, 2011 - 7:34pm

where is notification . it is not on the site of ministry of law.

  • 0
  • 0

akhilesh chandr...

June 15, 2011 - 11:00pm

heartiest congratulations to law minister for this notification of advocate act section 30. although it has decided very very late.thanks for this action.

  • 0
  • 0

S.Sambandham Ju...

June 16, 2011 - 10:39am

Indeed a long felt desire of legal fraternity. Hats of to Our Law minister

  • 0
  • 0

Saseendran Puth...

June 16, 2011 - 10:39am

Kudoos for the central Law Minister

  • 0
  • 0

Manju Jain

June 17, 2011 - 7:06pm

Iwant to change my mother state bar council.So pls advise me

  • 0
  • 0

HRISHIKESH DWIVEDI

June 19, 2011 - 4:48pm

dear Law Minister 50 year wait for notifying Sec.30 of Advocates Act (1961) must have agitated you to announce in favour of legal fraternity.Please end the WAIT by notifying.Congratulations in advance.

  • 0
  • 0

G.N Sharma

June 19, 2011 - 10:25pm

Please think about saving section 29 and 33 also.

  • 0
  • 0

Adhisaya Kumar.S.J

June 21, 2011 - 2:34pm

It is an excellent notification.... but there may be disadvantages too.... No concept of WAIT let it be swift.....

  • 0
  • 0

Abdhesh Chaudhary

June 21, 2011 - 2:34pm

Kudos to all the litigation lawyers. A similar move is needed to do away with the Advocate on record concept in the Supreme Court of India.

  • 0
  • 0

Aspiring Lawyer

June 8, 2011 - 11:22am

Thanks Mr. Moily. I have one question - will notification of this section entail render insignificant the status of 'Supreme Court Advocate on Record'?

  • 0
  • 0

ASHOK

June 22, 2011 - 9:05am

Where the copy of notification can be obtained.What will be the fate of existing transfer application before the BCI?

  • 0
  • 0

Dharmendra Nath...

June 22, 2011 - 12:40pm

Moilyjee Thank u Sir very much for notifying sec30 of Advocat Act.Sir i want to know when it will b implemented and wheather any advocate of any bar council of state can file his Vaklatnama in any court of state,tribunal and SupremeCourt.Thqanking u yours SincerelyDharmendra Nath karAdvocate,Orissa High Court,CuttackM-0943781161109861705079

  • 0
  • 0

ADV. LS JAIN

June 23, 2011 - 3:43pm

All advocates of India must congratulate Mr.Veerappa Moily for giving relief to the advocates by amendment Sec.30 of Act 1961. Mere passing an order will not sufficient. It is also duty of the Government and Hon'ble Minister to implement the same immediately in letter and spirit. Again we thank him for his initiative taken on behal of the advocates of India.

  • 0
  • 0

Parshotam Das S...

June 29, 2011 - 7:51pm

We, the advocates of Industrial Tribunal, Ludhiana are extremely happy to knowthe NOTIFICATION of section 30 of the act. We were going through a very hard time due to section 36-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.We pay our sincere thanks and extend our heartiest congratulations to our Hon'ble Law Minister of India SHRI VEERAPPA MOILY JI.

  • 0
  • 0

Lalith B Nair

June 30, 2011 - 4:20pm

At last it has happened. Now layers can practice in any courts without transferring their bar license. Cheers.

  • 0
  • 0

JANARDHANAREDDI...

July 6, 2011 - 8:16pm

LET THE LEARN FRIENDS CLARIFY THAT THE SUPREME COURT CAN ALSO ACCEPT THE VAKALAT OF ANY ADVOCATE OR ONLY AOR(ADVOCATE ON RECORD) AFTER THIS AMNDMT?

  • 0
  • 0

JANARDHANAREDDI...

July 6, 2011 - 8:43pm

LET THE LEARN FRIENDS CLARIFY THAT THE SUPREME COURT CAN ALSO ACCEPT THE VAKALAT OF ANY ADVOCATE OR ONLY AOR(ADVOCATE ON RECORD) AFTER THIS AMNDMT.

  • 0
  • 0

harish agre adv...

September 3, 2011 - 1:14pm

heartiest congratulations to law minister for notifying sec30 of Advocate Act..

  • 0
  • 0

MSD NAIR

September 15, 2011 - 5:01pm

With this it is not clear whether retired judges (including Asstt. Charity Commissioners) can practice as an advocate in the court where they had worked before retirement. It is heared that , it is an established practice/custom that retired judges of Supreme Court will not practice in any court in India, retired judges of High Courts can practice in Supreme Court i.e retired judges can practice as an advocate only in higher courts and not in the courts where they worked and also in lower courts to avoid influence. Kindly let me know whether these are correct or not.

  • 0
  • 0

Neeraj Kumar Ad...

September 17, 2011 - 6:00pm

At first heartly thanks for our law minister for this good news.beside it i want to know that after this amendemnt is any lawyer have voting right in other statesRegardsNeeraj kumar Advocate

  • 0
  • 0

aman sharma

June 8, 2011 - 5:03pm

thanks to our union law minister for passing this rule. he has really done a great job.

  • 0
  • 0

VINOD KUMAR MITTAL

September 18, 2011 - 3:23pm

Mr moily has considered the demand of advocates. it is praise worthy, This should be done earlier. now in the ear of development one can easily go from one state to another state. One advocate can represent in any state for a particular case. Thanks lot.

  • 0
  • 0

parkash bhardwaj

September 23, 2011 - 9:17am

It is a welcome step in indeed but both the Bar Councils( from where the name is to be transferred and to where the name is to be transferred) , are still charging the fee for transfer. Has the notification not yet been sent to the state Bar Councils.

  • 0
  • 0

b.s.s.babji ad...

December 3, 2011 - 9:26pm

all advocates can practice in all courts it is a well step for human rights advocate .b.s.s.babji ap

  • 0
  • 0

b.s.s.babji ad...

December 3, 2011 - 1:50pm

all advocates can practice in all courts it is a well step for human rights

  • 0
  • 0

Nandagopal Rao

March 5, 2012 - 4:42pm

If that is so, why there is need of Sec.18? There is no need to apply to BCI for transfer of Sanad from one State Bar Council to other.

  • 0
  • 0

Rajeev Kumar Agarwal

September 16, 2012 - 9:09pm

i will appriciate for if the said govt. will allow to all advocates to practice in any court with any exam for certificate of practice.

  • 0
  • 0

ARVIND SAXENA

November 13, 2012 - 7:56am

NO COMMENT

  • 0
  • 0

priyanka fartiyal

November 19, 2012 - 8:06pm

WHERE THE COPY OF NOTIFICATION CAN BE OBTAINED.

  • 0
  • 0

J Narayanan

June 10, 2011 - 2:25pm

Excellent move.

  • 0
  • 0

Satyendra kumar...

June 13, 2011 - 6:51am

A very very good move. He is the best lawyer of country and best law minister ever we had.

  • 0
  • 0

P.S. Bohara

June 13, 2011 - 8:13am

"Thanks to Hon'ble Union Law Minister Mr.Veerappamoily, for being rather sensitive for legal professionals, it is really a good law but he is expected to do some more in the field of judicial administration and law,as he has expressed earlier for the betterment of judicial system by inducting 'Accountability Bill'for achieving the justice in prompt and fair manner."

  • 0
  • 0

P.S. Bohara

June 13, 2011 - 8:14am

"Thanks to Hon'ble Union Law Minister Mr.Veerappamoily, for being rather sensitive for legal professionals, it is really a good law but he is expected to do some more in the field of judicial administration and law,as he has expressed earlier for the betterment of judicial system by inducting 'Accountability Bill'for achieving the justice in prompt and fair manner.

  • 0
  • 0

P.S. Bohara

June 13, 2011 - 10:10am

"Thanks to Hon'ble Union Law Minister Mr.Veerappa Moily, for being rather sensitive for legal professionals, it is really a good law but he is expected to do some more in the field of judicial administration and law,as he has expressed earlier for the betterment of judicial system by inducting 'Accountability Bill'for achieving the justice in prompt and fair manner.

  • 0
  • 0

Subbiah

June 13, 2011 - 11:30am

Immediately on the issue of notification under Sec 30, whether the advocates would become entitled to appear in departmental disciplinary proceedings initiated against the State, Central Government employees or public sector undertakings

  • 0
  • 0

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.