Bar & Bench News Network
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a petition seeking exclusion of advance and affluent Castes/Tribes of SCs and STs from the purview of reservation policy.
A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A. K. Patnaik has issued notices to the Centre and state governments seeking their response to introduce concept of creamy layer for SC and ST reservation, according to TOI.
The Bench passed the order while hearing a 100 page petition filed by a former Bureaucrat, O.P. Shukla, seeking exclusion of affluent Castes/Tribes of SCs and STs from the reservation quota. The Petitioner himself belongs to the extremely backward Community/Caste among the Scheduled Caste.
The Petitioner states that various Government studies and reports have eventually found that the benefits were not percolating down to the real and genuine beneficiaries. Resultantly, the intent and purpose of reservation or affirmative action for depressed or disadvantaged class stands defeated.
According to TOI, Advocate Balaji Srinivasan, appearing for the Petitioner, referred to various surveys conducted by state governments pointing out that there were affluent castes within SC and ST.
The Petitioner submitted that the ‘Reservation Policy’ that has been in force for the last 63 years is lopsided and fewer groups are getting the benefits which has resulted in these groups becoming advanced in all social parameters. In other words these groups no longer require benefits of reservation.
The Petitioner further submitted that it is an established fact that various state governments, as well as the Central Government has conducted various studies for measuring the actual beneficiaries of the Reservation Policy. All the Committees have enormously recommended that there should be the periodic review of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes requiring reservation.
It is also been found factually that none of the recommendation of these committees has been implemented thereby playing a fraud on the Constitution and also on its citizens. This has resulted in total and complete violation of Article 14, 15 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
The Petition states that as early as 1965, the Lokur Committee recommended exclusion of certain advanced castes/tribes. It was also pointed out by the committee that vested interests had emerged within SCs and STs as a result of concessions given to them. The Petition further stated that the Centre was unjustified in not extending the principles of creamy layer to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes.
The Petitioner has pleaded that Centre and state governments should be directed to take firm steps to review the scheduled or reservation policy and to implement the Lokur committee’s recommendations and to exclude Chamar, Mala, Mahar, Meena, Dusad Passi and Dhobi etc. from the schedule/list.
The Petitioner further prays that the Court directs the Centre and State Governments for equitable distribution of share of Reservation among 99% Ati Dalit castes so as to ameliorate the sufferings of age old Ati Dalits amongst the SCs /STs.
Till now, creamy layer among OBCs are not entitled to the reservation quota but no such stipulation for the SCs and STs have been made yet. This Petition is an attempt to exclude the creamy layer from SC/ST reservation policy.
|
- 1. "Rather than excluding certain affluent castes / tribes from SC and ST (that will result in exclusion of many individuals deserving the benefit of reservation on the ground of 'others' from his/ her caste / tribe being affluent) it is perhaps high time that a 'creamy layer' formula is devised for SC/ST quota. Excluding the creamy layer from SC/ST will ensure that the benefit of reservation reaches more number of families as opposed to the present situation wherein children of even grade 'A' officers claim reservation to the exclusion of those among SC/ST who are faced with economic problems in addition to social problems associated with their caste/tribe. ". Sevak, Delhi
- 2. "I do agree with the views expressed by Mr. Sevak that excluding certain affluent castes / tribes from SC and ST will result in exclusion of many individuals deserving the benefit of reservation on the ground of 'others' from his/ her caste / tribe being affluent.So far as legal aspect is concerned, issue of notice by the Hon'ble Supremey Court in PIL Writ Petition(Civil) 337/2011 create self-contradiction to its own judgement by a fuller 13 bench SCI( Supreme Court of India ) bench which ruled that categorisation shall not be applicable for SC & ST (Indira sawhney vs Union of India1992) when questions regarding categorisation of BC' s into creamy and non creamy layer came for hearing.However,it may be done by excluding children of all grade 'A' officers of SC/ST so that benefit of reservation reaches more number of deserving families who are faced with economic problems in addition to social problems associated with their caste/tribe.Jai Bharat". Sanjay, Jaipur
- 3. "RESERVATION IS GIVEN TO THEM THOSE ARE SOCIALLY AND EDUCATIONALLY BACKWARD.FOR POVERTY WE MUST HAVE GOVT. POLICY.RESERVATION IS NOT 'ROTI' TO FEED ALL 60% HUNGRY PEOPLE.NO WHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION,IT IS WRITTEN THAT RESERVATION ABOVE 50% IS NOT PERMITTED.PARTICULAR CASTE AS A WHOLE MUST NOT BE TARGETED AND CREAMY LAYER FROM UPPER CASTE ALSO MUST BE EXCLUDED.AGAIN,WE ALL KNOW THAT CHAMARS OR MAHARS IAS ARE NOT NOT SOCIALLY RESPECTED. ". R R BAG,ADVOCATE SC, DELHI
- 4. "this pil must be included not only exlusion of prosperous tribes but for all creamy layer among any tribe". Sapan Gujrati, Indore
- 5. "I do Agree with it..I am running a organization for the people who deserve to get the Reservation in real manner.. ". Tarun Mishra, Bhadra (Rajasthan)
- 6. "I do agree with it who comes underincometax (family income)must be excluded from reservation(women,sc,st,ph,cap)". Jalli.ramulu, (Unknown City?)karimnagar,andhra Pradesh
- 7. "I do agree with it ". Jalli.ramulu, (Unknown City?)karimnagar,andhra Pradesh
Related Stories
- Bombay High Court admits appeal against Shah Rukh Khan
- NLSIU can extend SC/ST reservation only to Karnataka students, says Karnataka HC
- 10 and counting... Supreme Court admits Ram Murti's petition against 377 judgement
- Delhi High Court admits SC's appeal on RTI ambit
- Rajasthan HC takes up letter petition as PIL; stays Gujjar reservation
- Women's Reservation may finally see the light of day, Law Minister promises to table Bill in Winter Session
- Shocked by the latest disaster? File a PIL; Rajasthan HC admits PIL on IOC fire
Other News
- SRGR responds to FoxMandal criminal complaint; SRGR files FIR against FoxMandal Partners; Police at FM's office today (Updated)
- Former FoxMandal litigation Partner Sandeep Mahapatra joins Juris Corp
- Amarchand lifts Bangalore SILF Premier League 2012 Trophy
- Foreign Law Firm Case: Judgment announced; Foreign lawyers cannot practice unless enrolled BCI; “Fly in fly out” permissible on foreign law and for arbitration (Download Judgment)
- Naz Foundation Update: SC begins hearing; Court says "the meaning is never constant, we have travelled sixty years"
- Interview with Professor (Dr) Alan Khee-Jin Tan, Director of the NYU@NUS Dual Degree Program
- Prashanth Sabeshan joins Majmudar & Co.
The Viewpoint - Issues relating to bribery and corruption in M&A transactions: A legal insight
Feb 22, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the tenth article on 'The Viewpoint' series with its Knowledge Partner AZB & Partners. AZB Partners Vineeta MG and Yogesh Bhattarai discuss the issues relating to bribery and corruption in M&A transactions. comments (1)










