Bar&Bench News Network
With over 31 million cases pending in Indian Courts, the Government is talking business. At a two-day conference organized by the Law Ministry on National Consultation for Strengthening the Judiciary Towards Reducing Pendency and Delays, they made clear their intention of not only shedding the tag of being the largest litigant in the country, but also improving the efficiency of the judiciary.
At the conference, the Law Ministry presented its Vision Statement, enumerating a scheme intended to chew up the seemingly insurmountable numbers and bring down the average pendency of a case to 3 years from the present 15 before the end of 2011.
If the proposals from the Vision Statement are implemented, we may soon see appointment of retired judges and senior lawyers on a contract basis adjudicating matters in shifts up to midnight. Other proposals include appointing 15,000 trial court judges and 700 high court judges on a contract basis, setting up an efficient classification of cases, and working on the Information and Communication Technology system on a global model.
Law Minister Veerappa Moily also proposed a National Litigation Policy which will underline the circumstances under which the government at the central and state level can approach the court. The government is India's biggest litigator, with a large percentage of the pending cases being filed by them.
The Vision Statement also proposes a National Arrear Grid specifically to monitor pending cases and suggest remedies to reduce time taken for adjudication.
Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justice S.H. Kapadia are in favor of hiking the court fees payable in commercial disputes, and subsidising the justice delivery system for the common man. Moily added that they would introduce a Bill in Parliament for establishing commercial courts in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai.
Emphasizing the quick delivery of justice, Justice Kapadia took the view that the delays, and consequent additional costs, have impacted FDI inflow into the country. Agreeing with Justice Kapadia, Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, who also attended the program, said, "States which have ensured smooth law on land acquisition and enforcement of law, have attracted FDI more than other states."
Moily also called for the collegium to work with the Government for appointing judges. "The government and the collegium should work hand in hand while appointing judges, so that the difference between the two does not lead to delay in appointment. The government should also be given the power to suggest outstanding lawyers and jurists as judges," he added.
Trial courts have a sanctioned strength of 16,721 judges, and there are 27 million cases pending with the trial courts. The high courts have a collective sanctioned strength of 886 judges, and have 4 million (40 lakh) pending cases. The Supreme Court has more than 50,000 pending cases and has a sanctioned strength of 31 judges. A progress report on the Vision Statement is to be submitted to the Prime Minister on Jan 31, 2010.
|
- 1. "vision statement is nice.problem is implementation.pendency is because of incapability of judges including other routine reasons.vision statement shines more if it also concentrate on regular trainings for judicial officers and also ministerial officers...srinivasrav kandaala.". Srinivasrav Kandaala, Andhrapradesh
- 2. "problem of pendency of cases is because of lack of awareness in the general public. corruption in judicial process and there should be proper rules and regulation on judicial system there should be some time limit withing some specific time case should be decide.". Anvi, Mumbai
- 3. "judges should be appointed according to their working experience,morality,personal character......". Moumita Chowdhury, Kolkata,west Bengal
Related Stories
- Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case: Ram Jethmalani to represent the former Home Minister Amit Shah
- Rajya Sabha MPs interact with the Law Minister: Critical discussion on Measures to Revamp Judiciary
- Khaitan & Co. represent Mahindra in cybersquatting case
- Looking past the hype: Lawyers Collective v. Chadbourne, Ashurst and White & Case
- Law Minister defends his jurisdiction from HRD encroachment
- Allegations of humiliation adds to Judiciary's woes
- The curious case of Nikolas and Leonard Balaz
Other News
- Law Firm Senior Partners speak on the SC decision to cancel 122 licenses: “Positives of the Vodafone judgment eroded by the SC judgment in the 2G case”
- Biggest law firm merger ends; FoxMandal and Little part ways; FM revives Mumbai office
- Supreme Court stays Calcutta High Court order; AIBE results to be announced within 72 hours.
- NLSIU's School Review Commission Report and NALSAR's Quadri Report: Does it open a Pandora’s Box?
- Interview with Dr. Sophie Sparrow: Fulbright scholar currently teaching at NLU Jodhpur
- Significant amendments proposed to Consumer Protection Act; Online filing to be made permissible, fines for non-compliance enhanced
- ALMT Legal gets four new partners; Total partner strength increases to 18
Feb 07, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the eighth article in 'The Viewpoint' series with its knowledge partner Amarchand Mangaldas. Amarchand Mangaldas Capital Markets team in its article analyses buyback and redemption routes available with Indian companies to restructure or redeem their outstanding FCCBs. comments (1)










