Bar&Bench News Network
Mumbai based Bachubhai Munim and the Mumbai office of Economic Laws Practice (ELP) will be arguing on the jurisdiction of Competition Commission of India (CCI) before the Bombay High Court. Vijay Mallya-owned Kingfisher Airlines has moved the Bombay High Court challenging CCI's investigation into the code sharing agreement between Jet Airways and Kingfisher Airlines.
The division bench comprising Chief Justice Swatanter Kumar and Justice AM Khanwilkar will hear the CCI plea which has engaged a heavy duty Senior Counsel list. Attorney General Goolam E. Vahanavati and Senior Counsel Andhyarujina who will argue along with ELP's Litigation Partner, Vikram Nankani and Competition Law Partner, Suhail Nathani along with Senior Associate Madhur Baya.
The CCI had initiated investigation in August 2009 to look into the October 2008 alliance between Jet Airways and Kingfisher. The complaint before the CCI was filed by a frequent flier who alleged that the alliance would lead to the formation of a cartel.
Kingfisher's stand is that since the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (MRTPC) is already looking into the alliance, the CCI investigation will only duplicate the process, and secondly, that the agreement was completed before May 2009 when the CCI was notified. Milind Sathe, Counsel for Kingfisher along with the name partner of Bachubhai Munim & Co., Atul Munim are representing the airline, while Government Counsel Rui Rodrigues is representing the Ministry of Corporate Affairs and others.
It is interesting to see a heavy duty panel engaged by a Government body. High time that Government bodies engaged professionals to defend its claims and actions before the Courts. While a bevy of Senior Counsels may not necessarily strengthen a weak case, it surely lends a certain amount of credibility.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- Competition Commission eyes Jet-Kingfisher Alliance, investigates DTH operators
- Airlines' woes continue as BPCL files winding up petition against Kingfisher
- Kingfisher besieged by creditors: Bombay HC orders 3.6 crore deposit as dues to Lufthansa
- Competition Commission in action: DTH operators, Kingfisher and banks investigated for 'anti-competition' practices
- ELP secures yet another order for CCI: SC refuses to stay a probe by the CCI into the alliance between Kingfisher Airlines and Jet Airways
- Competition Act gives CCI wide powers: Conversation on slapping a fine of Rs. 1 crore on Kingfisher with Samir Gandhi, Partner Economic Laws Practice
- M &A market heats up: Crawford Bayley advise Wall Street Finance in its acquisition by Spice Corp
Other News
- Law Firm Senior Partners speak on the SC decision to cancel 122 licenses: “Positives of the Vodafone judgment eroded by the SC judgment in the 2G case”
- Biggest law firm merger ends; FoxMandal and Little part ways; FM revives Mumbai office
- Supreme Court stays Calcutta High Court order; AIBE results to be announced within 72 hours.
- NLSIU's School Review Commission Report and NALSAR's Quadri Report: Does it open a Pandora’s Box?
- Interview with Dr. Sophie Sparrow: Fulbright scholar currently teaching at NLU Jodhpur
- Significant amendments proposed to Consumer Protection Act; Online filing to be made permissible, fines for non-compliance enhanced
- ALMT Legal gets four new partners; Total partner strength increases to 18
Feb 07, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the eighth article in 'The Viewpoint' series with its knowledge partner Amarchand Mangaldas. Amarchand Mangaldas Capital Markets team in its article analyses buyback and redemption routes available with Indian companies to restructure or redeem their outstanding FCCBs. comments (1)










