Bar&Bench News Network
While the Supreme Court's collegium awaits the Survey of India's report on the extent of land that Justice Dinakaran has allegedly encroached, a movement is in progress to impeach him.
Led by Senior Counsel Prashant Bhushan of Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reform (CJAR) and the Forum for Judicial Accountability (FJA), they are in the process for gathering signatures from the Members of Parliament to move for impeaching Justice Dinakaran. The petition is available here
Apart from the long standing allegations of encroachment of land and income disproportionate to his known sources of income, Bhushan casts doubts on Justice Dinakaran's judicial probity and integrity by alleging irregular and dishonest administrative actions.
Former Advocate General of Karnataka and Senior Counsel, B.V. Acharya, has submitted details of the Ooty property transaction, also detailed in the notice for impeachment. This is probably the first instance where prominent lawyers have taken the cudgels and seeking impeachment. While Justice Dinakaran might claim to be of a clean hand and heart, if any of the charges are proven true, it will open a Pandora's Box as far as he is concerned.
The Rajya Sabha, currently has 245 members, and the Lok Sabha, 545 members. For a notice of impeachment to be successful, the notice must garner the support of two-third of the members of both houses. With Bhushan having to look for atleast 164 members in the Rajya Sabha and atleast 364 members in the Lok Sabha, he surely has his task cut out.
Meanwhile, the principal court hall in the High Court at Bangalore remains empty today like yesterday, as Justice Dinakaran is not presiding since he is in Delhi meeting with the collegium to discuss his elevation.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Related Stories
- SC allows contempt plea by Salve; Prashant Bhushan faces contempt; calls for impeachment of Justice Dinakaran
- Nariman - Need to change the system; 66 MPs sign Bhushan's motion
- Dinakaran din; Shanti Bhushan protests Rao's inclusion
- 8 out of 16 CJI from 1990 have been corrupt says Shanti Bhushan: Prashant Bhushan to file his affidavit tomorrow
- Round 2: Prashant Bhushan files supplementary affidavit, detailing ‘evidence’ against alleged instances of judicial corruption
- Conversation with Prashant Bhushan
- Anna Hazare’s fast and (Jan) Lokpal Bill draws support from millions: Conversation with Prashant Bhushan
Other News
- Law Firm Senior Partners speak on the SC decision to cancel 122 licenses: “Positives of the Vodafone judgment eroded by the SC judgment in the 2G case”
- Biggest law firm merger ends; FoxMandal and Little part ways; FM revives Mumbai office
- Supreme Court stays Calcutta High Court order; AIBE results to be announced within 72 hours.
- NLSIU's School Review Commission Report and NALSAR's Quadri Report: Does it open a Pandora’s Box?
- Interview with Dr. Sophie Sparrow: Fulbright scholar currently teaching at NLU Jodhpur
- Significant amendments proposed to Consumer Protection Act; Online filing to be made permissible, fines for non-compliance enhanced
- ALMT Legal gets four new partners; Total partner strength increases to 18
Feb 07, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the eighth article in 'The Viewpoint' series with its knowledge partner Amarchand Mangaldas. Amarchand Mangaldas Capital Markets team in its article analyses buyback and redemption routes available with Indian companies to restructure or redeem their outstanding FCCBs. comments (1)










