Bar & Bench News Network
After a spate of litigations and suits against the Bar Council of India regarding the Bar exam and other disputes which adversely affect the students, the Union Cabinet on Monday cleared the ambitious National Educational Tribunals Bill, 2010 (Bill).
The Bill, which is aimed at solving disputes relating to education matters in a speedy and effective manner was introduced by the Ministry of Human Resources and Development (HRD). The Bill was first introduced in the Lok Sabha in May of this year after which it was referred to the Standing Committee.
The Bill seeks to set up Educational Tribunals at the State and National level to adjudicate educational disputes between students and institutions as well as teachers and institutions.
Each State Tribunal will consist of 3 members led by a Chairperson who has ample experience in the field of higher education and public affairs. The members must have also held the post of Vice Chancellor or Chief Secretary in the State government. These State Tribunals will have jurisdiction over disputes relating to teachers and other employees of higher education as well as disputes arising out of affiliation and unfair practices by these institutions.
The Bill also proposes a National Tribunal to be set up which will be led by a Chairperson and consists of a team of a maximum number of 8 persons. These members will be selected on the recommendation of a Selection Committee and will be appointed by the Central Government. The Chairperson shall be a judicial member and should have been a judge of the Supreme Court.
The National Tribunal will adjudicate matters and disputes relating to higher educational institutions and statutory bodies. The National Tribunal shall also act on appeals from the orders of the State Tribunals. Any order that is passed by the National Tribunal can be appealed or challenged only in the Supreme Court.
Showing that the HRD Ministry is serious in speeding up the educational reforms process, it has proposed that any failure to meet the orders passed by the tribunals shall attract a fine of Rs.10 lakhs ($ 21,300) or an imprisonment term of up to 3 years or both.
If the Bill is implemented in earnest by the government it will go a long way in making sure that the student body does not lose out on valuable time in litigations.
A copy of the Bill can be found here.
|
- 1. "I think the headline is tad misleading. Educational litigations are unlikely to end with the passing of the Bill. It's just that specialized fora are going to be constituted for adjudicating educational disputes. Also, the first para is non-sequitor. There does not seem to be any connection with the litigations against the Bar Council and the passing of the Bill. Legal Dodo". Legal Dodo, (Unknown City?)
- 2. "state tribunal to be headed by a eductionist but national tribunal by a supreme court judge ! funny logic.....". Alankar, Jamshedpur
- 3. "The setting up of tribunals will not end litigation, it will go on. Please do not allow only the lawyers to represent the parties. Let the retired officers who are well versed with service law do it. It will surely bring down the rate of litigation. Let the time limit for every Tribunal be three months to decide. There should be no appeal to S.C. The orders should be executed by the Tribunals only. Other the agony will be endless. ". Sham Lal Saini, House No. 50/30 A, Ramgali, N.M. Bagh, Ludhiana. , (Unknown City) Ludhiana In Punjab.
Related Stories
- Women's Reservation Bill clears Rajya Sabha hurdle - 186 to 1
- Judicial Accountability Bill gets cabinet nod: Charges against judges to be taken more seriously?
- Union Cabinet approves the National Mission for Justice Delivery and Legal Reforms
- Women's Reservation may finally see the light of day, Law Minister promises to table Bill in Winter Session
- 20 years of Sachin 'Ton'dulkar - Legal tussles: Ferrari, CA, National Flag and Terrorists
- National Law University, Jodhpur loses student in train mishap
- Bail condition of the day: Hoist the National Flag
Other News
- Law Firm Senior Partners speak on the SC decision to cancel 122 licenses: “Positives of the Vodafone judgment eroded by the SC judgment in the 2G case”
- Biggest law firm merger ends; FoxMandal and Little part ways; FM revives Mumbai office
- Supreme Court stays Calcutta High Court order; AIBE results to be announced within 72 hours.
- NLSIU's School Review Commission Report and NALSAR's Quadri Report: Does it open a Pandora’s Box?
- Interview with Dr. Sophie Sparrow: Fulbright scholar currently teaching at NLU Jodhpur
- Significant amendments proposed to Consumer Protection Act; Online filing to be made permissible, fines for non-compliance enhanced
- ALMT Legal gets four new partners; Total partner strength increases to 18
Feb 07, 2012 | Bar & Bench brings to you the eighth article in 'The Viewpoint' series with its knowledge partner Amarchand Mangaldas. Amarchand Mangaldas Capital Markets team in its article analyses buyback and redemption routes available with Indian companies to restructure or redeem their outstanding FCCBs. comments (1)










