In Defence of the Black Coat | Bar and Bench

In Defence of the Black Coat

The incidents of March 2 in the precincts of the City Civil Court, Bangalore mark a black day in the calendar of any law-abiding citizen. The aftermath of the incident sharply reflects the serious trust-deficit that exists among the fundamental pillars of civil-society – the police, the media and the legal fraternity.

By Aditya Sondhi

 

The incidents of March 2 in the precincts of the City Civil Court, Bangalore mark a black day in the calendar of any law-abiding citizen. The aftermath of the incident sharply reflects the serious trust-deficit that exists among the fundamental pillars of civil-society – the police, the media and the legal fraternity. What we are viewing now is a loss of faith among all these pillars, and more so, even within them. The legal community itself is now slowly getting divided into an ‘us versus them’ mindset, which is sadly becoming a divide between Trial Court lawyers and High Court lawyers, juniors and seniors, and in some cases, lawyers and judges.

 

While introspection is the need of the hour for us, surely it is a virtue that we can expect from others too. One may find it indefensible to justify an indefinite strike of work by advocates, but that does not mean there is no cause for angst among many fellow lawyers. Those who were taunted brazenly and beaten mercilessly, for no fault of their own, could scarcely be expected to bite the bullet. Every advocate who visits court daily is not there to make ‘galata’ or abuse and beat people. Almost always, he or she is there to espouse the case (and the cause) of a client who needs justice. For such an advocate to be beaten merely for being in the wrong place and the wrong time is no laughing matter and requires redressal.

 

Men may lie, but pictures do not. A series of short videos and pictures taken on mobile phones betray the high-handed assault on innocents at the court complex. Many of these are taken by junior lawyers who went to court to attend cases of their seniors. Some had their heads split open, others, their cars and motorbikes burnt. So much so, even the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge was manhandled in their presence, but this did not seem ‘news-worthy’ for most media houses. The impact of such unabashed violence on idealistic young lawyers is most profound. They may never believe in the system anymore. They may doubt the justice of the system at large - which is a tragic paradox for a lawyer.

 

It is ironic that other streams of society have taken it upon themselves to pass moral judgement on the legal fraternity. Of course, the legal fraternity is not beyond reproach or reform. However, the half-truths that were put out after the March 2 episode seem to be responsible for this misimpression. For every lawyer shown throwing a stone, what the media did not show was its own brethren indulging in rank unruly behavior. A visual media that is usually trigger-happy in going after the police for the smallest aberration chose also to ignore the sub-human attacks by the police on some helpless lawyers caught in the crossfire.

 

It is based on such ‘reports’ that the general public is being brain-washed into becoming lawyer-haters. What some factions of the Karnataka media forget is that when the Emergency suppressed its right to speech and expression, it was a legend from the Bar (and earlier the Bench)- M C Chagla, who rose in their defence. And when the police force needed reform, it was a Supreme Court judgement in Prakash Singh’s case that paved the way. These institutions – the police, the lawyers and media - are themselves part of justice delivery (particularly criminal justice) and can ill-afford to be partisan or vindictive. Those who are taking snide pleasure in fanning the fire should be aware that when one sows the wind, he reaps the whirlwind.

 

The political class would also do well to remember that Rule of Law depends on harmony between the various organs of society, and, particularly, on a robust, independent Bar. Suppressing and maligning the Bar as a whole is only going to be counter-productive, and smearing the legal community is only going to undermine faith in the judicial process. Aitzaz Ahsan, former president of the Pakistan Supreme Court Bar Association credits India’s success as a democracy to Her vibrant legal system. Lawyers were nation-builders and we as a community need to reclaim such glory. With some help from our fellow citizens, who need to be less skeptical and more discerning and notice the role Advocates play at great risk and sacrifice. They may like to remember that one swallow does not a summer make.

 

Aditya Sondhi is a practicing Advocate and an alumnus of National Law School of India University (NLSIU), Bangalore.

Category: 

Comments

ABHACHAWLAMOHANTY

March 21, 2012 - 5:32pm

MR ADITYA SONDHI WELL WRITTEN IN DEFENSE OF LAWYERS ... DO ELITIST LAWYERS REPRESENT THE COMMUNITY WHICH IS BEING PERCEIVED AS PIRANHAS OF CONSCIENCE AND SCRUPLES............ SIR , ANY DIRECT OR INDIRECT INTEREACT SERVES TO REMOVE HALO ..........ONCE THE RESPECTED AND NOBLE PROFESSION HELD!

  • 1
  • 1

Poonacha

March 21, 2012 - 11:41pm

Very well written Aditya.

  • 3
  • 2

Nayantara

March 23, 2012 - 6:17am

Thank you Mr. Sondhi. I've been trying to convince everyone around me that the whole situation was not a one-sided affair as the media had been portraying it.

  • 2
  • 1

Bha iqbal

March 23, 2012 - 6:42pm

Unless and until the comman masses wil be the law abiding citizens the law community wil be an issue.Nice sir.

  • 1
  • 1

PS DINESH KUMAR

April 4, 2012 - 11:52am

Execellent Aditya !!!!!!!!!!!

  • 3
  • 2

Sangeetha

April 17, 2012 - 3:33pm

This is all true, but Advocates did play role by addidng to the fire instead of aiding in putting an end to it. Why did they let it grow??????? They first let it grow and then they point fingers. We too watched everything that happened there from A to Z. Advocates could have Nipped it at the bud, but they chose not to....

  • 1
  • 2

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.