Bar&Bench News Network
Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran opened his arguments in the Ambani brothers' gas row. He submitted that any understanding between them was not binding as gas was not their "private property", but a national asset.
Reliance Natural Resources Limited (RNRL) counsel Ram Jethmalani promptly objected to the Petroleum ministry being permitted to be heard as a party to the dispute. He said the ministry had dropped its prayer in the Bombay High Court to be included as a party and was only accepted as an intervenor. Parasaran, however stood his ground that the Government has every right to be a party in this dispute.
Earlier, Harish Salve, representing Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) had demanded withdrawal of RNRL's allegation that the MoU was approved by its board. Jethmalani has locked horns with Salve regarding the latter making submissions not on the records of the Bombay High Court.
Rohinton Nariman, who concluded RIL's arguments insisted that a promoter's family arrangement cannot be imposed upon the company's shareholders. "The court has to act as an umpire. It only has a supervisory role," he said.
|
Be the first to post a comment 
Top News
- Significant amendments proposed to Consumer Protection Act; Online filing to be made permissible, fines for non-compliance enhanced
- ALMT Legal gets four new partners; Total partner strength increases to 18
- Clasis Law gets third new partner in as many months; Maritime law expert Harsh Pratap roped in to head Shipping practice
- Foreign Law Firms Case: Arguments concluded; Judgment reserved
- Conversation with Kartikeya Tanna: “What Vineet Narain and Justice Singhvi have done, Justice Ganguly has undone”
- NALSAR hit by another scandal; Committee finds NALSAR authorities guilty of gross abuse of power (Updated)
- AIBE Update: Results withheld due to Cal High Court injunction; BCI to approach Supreme Court










