No right to information on judgments, says SC
Bar&Bench News Network
Jan 05, 2010
 |
- 1. "I agree with the judgement given by the CJI on this matter Higher Courts are made to appeal against the lower courts, instead this person filed RTI. This is a clear cut abuse of the court procedures...". Advocate Ishan, New Delhi, India
- 2. "It is a rule of natural justice that an adjudicator must give reasons for his judgement (what lawyers know as a speaking order). So, if the reasons are given as a matter of practice, why would one need to apply RTI and get the reasoning. Only short orders are w/o reasons but all final judgements must have the reasoning behind them.". Anon, Delhi
Post Your Comment
Top News
- Significant amendments proposed to Consumer Protection Act; Online filing to be made permissible, fines for non-compliance enhanced
- ALMT Legal gets four new partners; Total partner strength increases to 18
- Clasis Law gets third new partner in as many months; Maritime law expert Harsh Pratap roped in to head Shipping practice
- Foreign Law Firms Case: Arguments concluded; Judgment reserved
- Conversation with Kartikeya Tanna: “What Vineet Narain and Justice Singhvi have done, Justice Ganguly has undone”
- NALSAR hit by another scandal; Committee finds NALSAR authorities guilty of gross abuse of power (Updated)
- AIBE Update: Results withheld due to Cal High Court injunction; BCI to approach Supreme Court
Webmasters: AIKYA