PTC Industries 
Dealstreet

Crawford Bayley, Trilegal, Hogan Lovells Cadwalader act on PTC Industries ₹1,800 crore QIP

The QIP witnessed strong demand from both international and domestic institutional investors and was oversubscribed over 5 times the issue size.

Bar & Bench

PTC Industries Limited has raised ₹1,800 crore from a qualified institutions placement of equity shares.

Crawford Bayley & Co advised PTC Industries on this QIP, as per the placement document.

Trilegal advised the lead managers ICICI Securities Limited and Goldman Sachs (India) Securities Private Limited on this QIP.

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader acted as international counsel to the lead managers.

The transaction was led by Biswajit Chatterjee (Head of the India Practice and Dubai Office Managing Partner), with support from Varun Jetly (Counsel) and Jayant Bhardwaj (Senior Associate).

Biswajit Chatterjee

PTC Industries is an advanced manufacturing company, which manufactures strategic materials, high-precision metal components and engineered products for critical applications across various industries including aerospace and defence.

The QIP witnessed strong demand from both international and domestic institutional investors and was oversubscribed over 5 times the issue size, with a significant portion of the demand coming from global institutional investors, including Fidelity Investments, Capital Group, Fidelity International, Aberdeen, and Abu Dhabi Investment Authority.

If you would like your Deals, Columns, Press Releases to be published on Bar & Bench, please fill in the form available here.

InsuranceDekho merges with RenewBuy; DSK, Khaitan, CAM, CMS INDUSLAW, TT&A, Bharucha, EVA Law advise

Paying members of sports clubs are consumers under Consumer Protection Act: Gujarat consumer commission

Litigants can't seeks archived recordings of court proceedings without judicial order: Karnataka High Court

NLSIR extends submission deadline for Chief Justice ES Venkataramiah Memorial Best Essay Prize

Waiting for Godot in Court 1: The art of judicial absurdity in Supreme Court

SCROLL FOR NEXT