News

CLAT 2018: Allotment subject to outcome of petition, Supreme Court

Bar & Bench

The Supreme Court today clarified that the seat allotment for various National Law Universities (NLUs) based on the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT 2018) will be subject to the outcome of the petition in the Court.

A vacation Bench of Justices AK Goel and Ashok Bhushan heard the batch of petitions which have raised a series of grievances against the manner in which CLAT 2018 was conducted this year.

The allotment of seats will now proceed as scheduled but the final allotment of seats will be subject to the outcome of the petition in Supreme Court. The first indicative seat allotment list is due to be published tomorrow, ie June 7.

Meanwhile, National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS), the organizing University, today submitted its report on the grievances raised by various candidates. The Court directed that a copy of the report be served on the petitioners.

This report has been prepared pursuant to the order of the Court, which had directed NUALS to constitute a grievance redressal committee to look into the complaints raised by the candidates.

The matter will now be heard on June 11.

Last week, the Court refused to stay the publication of the results of CLAT 2018, which were released on May 31.

After a number of petitions were filed in various high courts challenging the conduct of this year’s exam, a petition finally came to be filed in the Supreme Court as well.

Note: This story was last updated at 12.30 pm on June 6, 2018.

Read the order below. 

CLAT-Order-060618.pdf
Preview

Delhi High Court orders removal of AAP's AI-generated posts showing Delhi CM Rekha Gupta as liquor vendor

Kerala High Court asks Kochi police to bring private bus drivers under Smart ID system

Delhi High Court allows sale of book about Rana Kapoor after deletion of four offending passages

Can couple opt for surrogacy when wife is over 50 but husband is within age limit? Bombay High Court decides

Lawyers flag concerns over Delhi High Court ruling on IP jurisdiction before full bench

SCROLL FOR NEXT