Ranveer Allahbadia, Samay Raina 
Litigation News

India's Got Latent row: Supreme Court quashes FIRs against Samay Raina, Ranveer Allahbadia, others

The Court today also appreciated the efforts made by Raina, Goyal, Ghai, Thakkar and Tanwar to organise shows for the benefit of persons with disabilities.

Ritwik Choudhury

The Supreme Court on Friday quashed criminal cases filed against digital creator and podcast host Ranveer Allahbadia, and YouTuber-comedians Samay Raina, Ashish Chanchlani and four others over their controversial remarks during an episode of comedy talent show, India's Got Latent.

A Bench Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana passed the order.

Apart from Allahbadia, Raina, and Chanchlani, the others who have been given relief in connection with this case are Vipul Goyal, Balraj Paramjeet Singh Ghai, Sonali Thakkar alias Sonali Aditya Desai, and Nishant Jagdish Tanwar.

The Court today also appreciated the efforts made by Raina, Goyal, Ghai, Thakkar and Tanwar to organise shows for the benefit of persons with disabilities.

"Once there are genuine efforts positive results are bound to be there. They are very bright youngsters. If they have started working in positive direction, there will be positive output," the Bench said.

The Court proceeded to quash criminal cases filed against Raina, Goyal, Ghai, Thakkar and Tanwar over insensitive remarks made on the show against disabled persons.

The Court, however, will hear the matter further to consider suggestions from persons with disabilities on how to ensure better checks on such content and frame appropriate directions on the broader issues involved.'

"Matter qua respondents 6-10 (the accused comedians) is closed. Criminal proceedings against respondents 6-10 are hereby quashed. All other related proceedings are set aside. List to issue directions on the larger issue," the Court said.

Justice Joymalya Bagchi, CJI Surya Kant and Justice V Mohana
They are very bright youngsters. If they have started working in positive direction, there will be positive output.
Supreme Court

Moreover, the Court decided to order the closing of criminal cases against Allahbadia and Chanchlani as well, over obscene comments they had made during the controversial India's Got Latent episode.

"We also find it apposite that the proceedings forming the subject matter of Writ Petition (Criminal) Nos. 83/2025 (petition filed by Allahabadia to quash the FIRs against him) and 85/2025 (petition filed by Chanchlani) be closed. The continuation of those proceedings, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of these cases, would not serve any cogent purpose," the Court said.

The Court had earlier indicated that it wished to examine larger issues about whether there should be more checks on content uploaded on the internet or on social media.

In its order, however, the Court opined that such issues can be considered in another appropriate case.

"We are cognisant that important larger issues regarding the scope of regulation of speech on internet-based social media remain to be dealt with. In our considered opinion, those issues can be taken up by this Court in another appropriate case, while the Criminal Writ Petitions can be disposed of. It, however, goes without saying that there is no impediment for the appropriate executive authority to take necessary steps, as permissible in law, on this aspect," the Court's order states.

The episode of India's Got Latent under scrutiny before the top court was shot on November 14, 2024, at Khar Habitat but aired later.

Several persons who appeared on the comic show were booked in multiple criminal cases for making obscene and insensitive remarks. Ranveer Allahbadia (BeerBiceps) and Ashish Chanchlani later approached the Supreme Court seeking to quash the FIRs against them. They were granted interim protection from arrest until the Court took a final decision on their petitions.

Meanwhile, a plea was moved before the top court by an NGO called Cure SMA India Foundation, accusing Raina and three others of insensitive remarks over the high cost of treatment for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA).

Raina was also alleged to have ridiculed a person with such a disability. The petition was filed seeking regulations for the broadcast of such online content in violation of the right to life and dignity of persons with disabilities.

All these matters were eventually tagged and considered together by the Court.

In November 20205, Raina and the other comedians named in the SMA foundation's plea were directed by the Court to organise at least two events a month to raised funds for the corpus setup for the treatment of persons with disability. They were also directed to persuade disabled persons to join them in their programs.

However, the NGO later told the Court that Raina never contacted them or any other disabled person to join any of his shows.

Raina's counsel replied that ₹9 lakh was raised through the shows for disabled persons. He added that specially-abled people were, in fact, called to the show. He further said that Raina will reach out to the NGO as well.

However, the Court took exception to Raina's failure to properly comply with its earlier directives and imposed costs on him and others, ordering them to pay ₹3 lakh each.

The Court also warned of further costs if Raina and others continued flouting its directives.

Today, the Court took note of submissions that Raina and the others have organised a chess tournament for specially abled persons in March at Pune, and that four more shows have been scheduled to be held for fund raising, which are yet to be held.

They also expressed their willingness to invite persons suffering from SMA to these shows and provide them financial support. They added that they will be in touch with the petitioner-foundation to coordinate how this could be done.

Further, an amount of ₹12.5 crores has been received from their shows already, which can be donated for the welfare of specially-abled persons, they said.

The Court today appreciated these efforts.

"The significant averment in the compliance affidavit which deserves appreciation is that constructive conversation have taken place between them and the petitioners. Respondents have expressed gratefulness for guidance from petitioner NGO for helping arrange their programs," it said.

The Court concluded that these measures reflect a true compliance with the earlier directives.

"We have no doubt that respondents 6-10 will work hard in their endeavour to organise events for celebrating the lives and increasing dignity of SMA warriors and any other event suggested by the NGO shall also be promptly organised. Responders will continue to seek guidance from petitioners for such events," the Court added.

Senior Advocate Aparajita Singh represented the Cure SMA India Foundation.

Samay Raina was represented by Senior Advocate Madhavi Divan along with advocates Abhay Pratap Singh, Stuti Gujral, Lavin Hirani, Shubhangni Jain, Ayush Kaushik, Jaanvi Chopra, Sruthi Susan Mathew and Miran Ahmad.

[Read Order]

Ranveer Allahabadia v. UOI and related matters.pdf
Preview

Note: An earlier version of the article only reported on the closing of cases filed against Samay Raina, Vipul Goyal, Balraj Paramjeet Singh Ghai, Sonali Thakkar alias Sonali Aditya Desai, and Nishant Jagdish Tanwar. The article has been updated to reflect the closing of proceedings concerning Ranveer Allahbadia and Ashish Chanchlani as well, which could be confirmed only after the publication of the Court's order.

[Read Live Coverage]

Supreme Court slams "social-media driven PIL" seeking NEET-PG re-exam, imposes ₹25,000 costs

MBBS graduate moves Supreme Court for degree withheld by college after NIA seized fees she paid

NCLT shifts to double-sided A4 paper filings across all benches

Bombay HC asks Metro Brands to pursue its passing off claim against MetBrands before Kerala court

Ilaiyaraaja v. Saregama: Judicial adventurism?

SCROLL FOR NEXT