Karnataka HC and POCSO 
Litigation News

Karnataka High Court grants bail to POCSO accused after victim's family agrees to their marriage

The Court noted that the accused and the victim's family have reached an understanding that the possibility of marriage would be considered once the victim attains the legally prescribed age.

Hiranya Bhandarkar

The Karnataka High Court recently granted bail to a man accused of penetrative sexual assault under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act after the victim's family agreed to their possible marriage.

Justice Venkatesh Naik T noted that the accused and the victim's family had reached an understanding that the possibility of marriage would be considered once the victim attains the legally prescribed age.

The Court also recorded that police had completed investigation in the case and filed a chargesheet against the accused.

"Having regard to the completion of the investigation, the affidavits filed by the parties, the no-objection expressed by the victim’s mother and the understanding arrived at between the families, I am of the opinion that the continued detention of the petitioner may not be necessary, provided adequate conditions are imposed to safeguard the interests of the victim and ensure the petitioner’s presence during trial," the Court said.

Justice Venkatesh Naik T

The accused was booked in the case alleging offences of penetrative sexual assault, aggravated penetrative sexual assault, rape, causing hurt, and criminal intimidation on the basis of a complaint filed on May 22. He was arrested a day later and remained in judicial custody since then.

After a trial court rejected his bail on September 26, the accused approached the High Court.

Taking into account the complainant's no objection to the bail and the completion of the investigation, the Court on November 5 ordered the release of the accused. With regard to the settlement arrived at between the families, the Court said,

"Though the said understanding cannot, by itself, determine the merits of the prosecution or nullify the statutory provisions, the same can be taken into consideration as one of the relevant circumstances while considering the prayer for bail."

Advocate Sadik Kanvi appeared for the accused.

High Court Government Pleader Dayanand Sangreshi appeared for the State.

Advocate Ameena HS represented the complainant.

Karnataka High Court quashes SC/ST Act case against Bharat Forge chairman Baba Kalyani

2023 Parliament security breach: Delhi court denies bail to accused Manoranjan D, Sagar Sharma

Aditya Singha, Sandesh Atyam launch law firm - Varartha

Punjab & Haryana High Court rejects DLF plea to cancel its former CFO's bail in extortion case

Rules for me but not for thee? Courts are not above the people

SCROLL FOR NEXT