Statue of Netaji Subash Chandra Bose 
News

No fundamental right: Delhi High Court on PIL alleging government failed to act on promise for INA memorial

The Court rejected the argument that goverment's failure to establish the memorial violated Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

Prashant Jha

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday refused to pass orders to establish a memorial for Subhash Chandra Bose's Indian National Army (INA) in Delhi's Red Fort.

A Division Bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia said that the Court cannot issue such a direction in a public interest litigation (PIL) petition.

It also pulled up the organisation named Mahan Swantantrata Senani Lalti Ram Trust for arguing that the government's failure to establish the memorial violated their fundamental rights under Articles 21 and 14 of the Constitution.

Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia

The Bench noted that the PIL was based on a press release issued by the Central government in 2021 in which it was stated that a memorial would be established at Red Fort for the martyred INA soldiers.

"The announcements made through PIB press releases, in our opinion, do not, in itself, can form the basis of seeking any right," the Court said.

It added that the erection of a memorial is the discretion of the government.

"Whatever makes you feel good does not become subject matter of PIL. Erection or no erection of a memorial is the discretion of the government. Courts can’t interfere. Whether or not to create a memorial can’t be a debatable issue before a court of law," the Bench remarked.

The Court then granted the petitioner liberty to file a representation before the government. The Bench added that if a representation is made, the government should consider it and pass a reasoned order.

Reflecting on the limitations of the writs, the Court added,

“Ye kaun nhi chaahega ki Hindustan swarg ho jaae to kya ham mandamus jaari kar dein? (Who wouldn't want India to be heaven, but should we issue a mandamus for that to be done?)” 

This matter is jinxed: Supreme Court on repeated adjournments in Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute plea

Delhi High Court rejects NSUI candidate's plea challenging Delhi University Students Union election result

2021 Antilia bomb scare case: Bombay High Court stays Sachin Waze's bail after urgent hearing

No 24-hour firecracker use during Diwali but no total ban either: Supreme Court moots balanced approach

Settle disputes amicably, don't take vengeance through litigation: Madras High Court to Church of South India

SCROLL FOR NEXT