Punjab and Haryana High Court and ED 
News

P&H High Court holds late-night hearing via WhatsApp after Punjab claims ED detained top bureaucrats

Following the hearing, the Court directed its Registry to appoint a warrant officer to visit the premises of GMADA.

Bar & Bench

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Wednesday held a late-night hearing after Punjab government alleged that the Enforcement Directorate had detained its top bureaucrats during the agency's ongoing raids at the office of Greater Mohali Development Authority (GMADA) [State of Punjab v Union of India and Ors]

Justice Sanjay Vashisht heard a habeas corpus petition moved by the Punjab government at 10 PM against the alleged illegal confinement of IAS officers Vikas Garg and Sandeep Reshi, and various senior officers of GMADA.

The State government alleged that the raid was continuing for the past two days and the officers were not allowed to go their homes since September 22. The ED is conducting raids at the GMADA office in connection with a money laundering probe.

Following the hearing, the Court directed its Registry to appoint a warrant officer to visit the premises of GMADA and the office of Vikas Garg, the Principal Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development.

The Warrant Officer was directed to examine the overall situation, including if any predicate offence is registered against the officers of GMADA or the organization itself.

The Court also directed the release of any female official found confined at the premises, if deemed so appropriate. The Warrant Officer has been directed to submit a report by 2 pm today.

Chandigarh Police was directed to provide adequate security and other facilities for compliance of the order.

The court order was passed at 10:42 PM. Sources said the warrant officer entered the GMADA premises at 2:50 am and exited the place at 5:45 am.

Senior Advocate Vikram Chaudhari with Additional Advocate General Ferry Sofat represented the State of Punjab.

Calcutta High Court pulls up State for arresting Nandigram Congress candidate in yet another 2007 case

Supreme Court asks ECI for timeframe to decide on Trinamool Congress name, symbol

Judicial process must provide remedy, not merely identify litigant's wound: Madras High Court

Supreme Court seeks progress reports from High Courts on 8 lakh pending civil execution petitions

Supreme Court seeks reply from MP Nilesh Lanke on BJP's Sujay Vikhe-Patil's election challenge

SCROLL FOR NEXT