Seeing from the perspective of a GC, choosing the right Law Firm is like selecting the perfect brushstroke for a masterpiece. A recent report by legal knowledge platform, LawWiser, explores the factors which in-house counsel consider as important in this process of selection. Like discerning artists, proven expertise comes up as the paramount criterion for GCs while selecting their external legal advisors. This is followed by cost effectiveness. However, cost-effectiveness isn't merely about slashing fees; it's also about the optimal utilisation of the legal budget. This nuance is something which Law Firms need to understand and work together with clients on.

General Counsel nowadays seem to be meticulously weighing prior relationships, peer referrals, and industry-specific experience when selecting external advisors. Yet, they yearn for more than legal prowess; they crave commercial acumen and real-time solutions that transcend conventional legal opinions and representation. For GCs, it seems the ideal Law Firm is a strategic partner that seamlessly integrates into their business landscape, understanding its intricacies as intimately as they do.

Like a melody that evolves over time, the relationship between GCs and Law Firms is subject to constant refinement. The recent GC Insider survey done by LawWiser reveals that GCs have been expanding their roster of external advisors, with a substantial portion of them orchestrating changes in their primary law firm within the last 2-3 years. These seismic shifts are for a myriad of reasons, stemming from quality concerns and poor service to the departure of key personnel to another firm.

Another factor at play seems the emerging trend of risk mitigation, in as much as GCs not willing to place all their eggs in one basket and farming out work to more than one firm. In such a scenario, for Law Firms, the key to retaining the client seems to be in institutionalizing relationships and cultivating multiple points of contact. Just as a symphony requires various instruments working together, a robust client relationship necessitates a diverse ensemble of voices.

In this orchestra, however melodious it may sound, budgetary constraints often play a discordant note. One uniform lament by all GCs is that Law Firms frequently overlook cost containment efforts. Yet, amidst this cacophony, opportunities for harmony emerge. Transparent billing structures, coupled with flexible payment options, can transform this discord into concord. By embracing fixed or capped billing arrangements and providing data-driven insights during budgeting, Law Firms can strike a harmonious balance that resonates with their clients.

As the legal landscape evolves, so too does the composition of legal teams within corporations. The report also highlights the trend of moving legal work in-house which has gained momentum, fostering efficiency, reducing costs, and enhancing agility. This shift empowers GCs to wield their legal baton with finesse, tackling critical functions such as M&A, contract drafting, and litigation strategy in-house. Yet, amidst this transformation, a delicate balance must be struck. While in-house teams bolster efficiency and cost-effectiveness, they also need to be always aware of the need for Law Firms to provide specialized expertise and remain adaptable in an ever-changing legal landscape.

Dispute Resolution law firm Vesta Legal inaugurates new office in Pune

Related Stories