Critical analysis of judgment welcome but not allegations against judge: Rajasthan High Court

The Court imposed costs of ₹10,000 on certain litigants who sought to transfer a suit to a different trial court on allegations that the presiding judge was acting in connivance with an opposing lawyer.
Rajasthan High Court
Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court recently remarked that while a critical analysis of a judgment in the right perspective is appreciated, the practice of casting aspersions on judges must be deprecated [Babulal vs. Shri Mahaveer Jain Swetamber Pedhi(Trust)].

Loading content, please wait...
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news