A fourth Constitution Bench has been set up by the Supreme Court to hear five cases..The bench comprising Justices S Abdul Nazeer, BR Gavai, AS Bopanna, V Ramasubramanian and BV Nagarathna will hear the following cases:.- Plea against demonetisation [Vivek Narayan Sharma v. Union of India]; - Issue relating to freedom of speech of public/ State functionaries [Kaushal Kishor v. State of Uttar Pradesh]; - Whether the immunity conferred on members of the Legislative Assembly (under Article 194(2)) in respect of any vote given by them in the Legislature includes immunity against prosecution for bribery [Sita Soren v. Union of India];- Issue relating to Section 319 CrPC [Sukhpal Singh Khaira v. State of Punjab ];- Whether in the absence of evidence of complainant/direct or primary evidence of demand of illegal gratification, is it not permissible to draw inferential deduction of culpability/guilt of a public servant under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 based on other evidence adduced by the prosecution [Neeraj Dutta v State of NCT of Delhi].The Supreme Court on Tuesday started live streaming of Constitution Bench hearings. .[Read Notice]
A fourth Constitution Bench has been set up by the Supreme Court to hear five cases..The bench comprising Justices S Abdul Nazeer, BR Gavai, AS Bopanna, V Ramasubramanian and BV Nagarathna will hear the following cases:.- Plea against demonetisation [Vivek Narayan Sharma v. Union of India]; - Issue relating to freedom of speech of public/ State functionaries [Kaushal Kishor v. State of Uttar Pradesh]; - Whether the immunity conferred on members of the Legislative Assembly (under Article 194(2)) in respect of any vote given by them in the Legislature includes immunity against prosecution for bribery [Sita Soren v. Union of India];- Issue relating to Section 319 CrPC [Sukhpal Singh Khaira v. State of Punjab ];- Whether in the absence of evidence of complainant/direct or primary evidence of demand of illegal gratification, is it not permissible to draw inferential deduction of culpability/guilt of a public servant under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 based on other evidence adduced by the prosecution [Neeraj Dutta v State of NCT of Delhi].The Supreme Court on Tuesday started live streaming of Constitution Bench hearings. .[Read Notice]
