BCI disputes maintainability of plea challenging Section 9 of Advocates Act in Madras High Court

The BCI's counsel submitted on Monday that there is not a single statement in the petitioner's affidavit as to how Section 9 of the Advocates' Act violates the Constitution.
BCI, Madras HC
BCI, Madras HC

The Bar Council of India (BCI) has disputed the maintainability of the plea challenging the validity of Section 9 of the Advocates Act, 1961, the Madras High Court was told on Monday (Karthik Ranganathan v. Union of India and 2 ors)

Want to read the full story?

We’re glad you’re enjoying this story. Subscribe to any of our plans to continue reading the story.

Already have an account? Sign In

Related Stories

No stories found.
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news