Judicial propriety demands that I don't hear CBI case as well: Special Judge from whom Satyendar Jain ED case was transferred

Special Judge Geetanjali Goel said that as the ED case, stemming from the same allegations against Jain, was transferred to another court, it would not be appropriate for her to hear the CBI case.
Rouse Avenue Courts and Satyendar Jain
Rouse Avenue Courts and Satyendar JainFacebook

The Special Court hearing the case filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against Delhi Minister Satyendar Jain has said that “judicial propriety demands” it does not further hear the case in view of the recent transfer of the money laundering case filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against Jain to another court [CBI v. Satyender Kumar Jain & Ors].

Want to read the full story?

We’re glad you’re enjoying this story. Subscribe to any of our plans to continue reading the story.

Already have an account? Sign In

Related Stories

No stories found.
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
www.barandbench.com