<p>The Allahabad High Court on Monday granted bail to a man who allegedly made objectionable remarks against the Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and other public representatives.</p>.<p>While granting bail to the accused, Justice <strong>Siddharth</strong> added,</p>.<div><blockquote>"Applicant will not use social media for a period of two years or till the conclusion of trial before the Trial Court, whichever is earlier."</blockquote><span class="attribution">Allahabad High Court</span></div>.<p>The applicant, Akhilanand Rao, was also alleged to have <em>falsely shown his status and tried to obtain undue advantages.</em></p>.<p>He was booked under Sections 419, 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act.</p>.<p>Advocate <strong>Vimal Kumar Pandey,</strong> appearing for the applicant, submitted that the allegations were a case of false implication by the police. </p>.<p>The High Court noted that the applicant was in jail since May 12 and had a a criminal history of 11 cases, as mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application.</p>.<p>Having considered the material on record, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of the Supreme Court in the case of <em><strong><a href="https://indiankanoon.org/doc/122663958/" rel="nofollow">Dataram Singh v State of U.P. and another</a></strong></em>, the High Court ordered the release of the applicant on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with certain other conditions.</p>.<p>The order adds that a breach of any of the conditions would be a ground for cancellation of bail.</p>.<p><strong>Read the order here. </strong></p>
<p>The Allahabad High Court on Monday granted bail to a man who allegedly made objectionable remarks against the Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and other public representatives.</p>.<p>While granting bail to the accused, Justice <strong>Siddharth</strong> added,</p>.<div><blockquote>"Applicant will not use social media for a period of two years or till the conclusion of trial before the Trial Court, whichever is earlier."</blockquote><span class="attribution">Allahabad High Court</span></div>.<p>The applicant, Akhilanand Rao, was also alleged to have <em>falsely shown his status and tried to obtain undue advantages.</em></p>.<p>He was booked under Sections 419, 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act.</p>.<p>Advocate <strong>Vimal Kumar Pandey,</strong> appearing for the applicant, submitted that the allegations were a case of false implication by the police. </p>.<p>The High Court noted that the applicant was in jail since May 12 and had a a criminal history of 11 cases, as mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application.</p>.<p>Having considered the material on record, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of the Supreme Court in the case of <em><strong><a href="https://indiankanoon.org/doc/122663958/" rel="nofollow">Dataram Singh v State of U.P. and another</a></strong></em>, the High Court ordered the release of the applicant on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with certain other conditions.</p>.<p>The order adds that a breach of any of the conditions would be a ground for cancellation of bail.</p>.<p><strong>Read the order here. </strong></p>
