Supreme Court judgments under Article 142 not binding precedent, cannot be applied with examining facts: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Justice Anil Kshetarpal said that the judgement of the Supreme Court in State of Punjab vs. Rafiq Masih is one such judgment which was passed under Article 142 and cannot be considered a binding precedent.
Supreme Court judgments under Article 142 not binding precedent, cannot be applied with examining facts: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that a judgment passed by the Supreme Court in exercise of powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India cannot be applied as a binding precedent without examining the facts of a case (Prabhu Kumar Rawat vs. National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd.)

Want to read the full story?

We’re glad you’re enjoying this story. Subscribe to any of our plans to continue reading the story.

Already have an account? Sign In

Related Stories

No stories found.