Supreme Court reserves verdict in appeal seeking details of December 2018 Collegium meeting

The Supreme Court on Friday reserved its verdict in a plea challenging an order of the Delhi High Court which dismissed a petition seeking details of the Supreme Court Collegium meeting held on December 12, 2018 that were never made public..A Bench of Justices MR Shah and CT Ravikumar was hearing a plea by activist Anjali Bhardwaj arguing that information cannot be denied on the bland assertion that it does not exist.“Multiple documents, including official records, reference the agenda for the collegium meeting,” the petition said..The plea filed through advocate Prashant Bhushan stated that the information regarding appointments and recommendations by the Supreme Court Collegium cannot be regarded as a protected class of documents, as no information relevant to public interest can be covered under the veil of secrecy..The order under challenge had upheld a decision of the single-judge which had come on appeal against an order of the Central Information Commission (CIC) upholding the stance of the Supreme Court that no disclosure about the meeting can be made since no resolution was passed in that meeting, as the required consultation could not be completed..The petitioner had said that on October 3, 2017, the Collegium had resolved to publicise its decisions on its website, whenever recommendations are sent to the government with regard to initial elevation of judges to the High Courts, their appointments as permanent judges, elevation to the post of Chief Justice of High Court, transfer of High Court Chief Justices/judges and elevation to the Supreme Court.It was stated that on December 12, 2018, a meeting of the Collegium was held in which certain decisions were taken, but no information about the same was put on the website..On January 10, 2019, a newly constituted Collegium of the apex court (without Justice Madan B Lokur) met again and passed a resolution stating that it had met on December 12, 2018 to consider and recommend names for appointment as judges to the Supreme Court and to consider the proposal for transfer of Chief Justices and judges of the High Courts..Bhardwaj had said that it was apparent that there was a meeting of Collegium on December 12, 2018 with an agenda and some decisions were in fact taken in the meeting..The petitioner filed a Right to Information (RTI) application with the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the apex court on February 26, 2019. Through a letter dated March 11, 2019, the CPIO stated that the information sought was held to be not proper by the First Appellate Authority (FAA), and therefore, not relevant.The Second Appeal before the CIC was also denied on the same grounds on December 16, 2021.