
The Supreme Court on Monday observed that when it comes to ownership of a land attached to a temple, the name of the presiding deity alone is required to be mentioned while the pujari is only to perform puja and acts as a grantee to manage the property of the deity (State of Madhya Pradesh and Others v. Pujari Utthan Avam Kalyan Samiti and Another).
We’re glad you’re enjoying this story. Subscribe to any of our plans to continue reading the story.