<p>Supreme Court judge, Justice <strong>UU Lalit, </strong>on Monday, recused from hearing a plea seeking action against Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister, YS Jaganmohan Reddy for raising allegations against Supreme Court judge, Justice NV Ramana.</p>.<p>The plea came up before a Bench which also comprised Justices <strong>Vineet Saran </strong>and <strong>Ravindra Bhat,</strong> when Justice Lalit remarked:</p>.<blockquote>"As a lawyer, I had represented these parties in litigation. I cannot take up this matter. Let this matter be listed at the earliest before any other judge decided by the CJI."</blockquote>.<p>The court was hearing three separate petitions seeking inquiry and action against the Chief Minister for his ‘scandalizing’ remarks against the second senior-most judge of the top court, Justice NV Ramana. </p>.Remove Andhra Pradesh CM Jaganmohan Reddy from post for making "scandalising" remarks against sitting judge: PIL in Supreme Court.<p>The petitioners, who are three advocates <strong>GS Mani, Pradeep Kumar Yadav </strong>and <strong>Sunil Kumar Singh </strong>and NGO <strong>Anti-Corruption Council of India Trust </strong>have submitted that the allegations levelled by Reddy against Justice Ramana are baseless. They have also highlighted that Reddy is facing over 20 criminal cases. </p>.<p>Petitioners have sought a judicial inquiry by an internal committee headed by sitting or retired judges of the Supreme Court or any authority including the Central Bureau of Investigation, into the allegations raised by the Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister. </p>.<p>Advocate Sunil Kumar Singh, in his petition, has asked the top court to issue a show cause to Reddy after his government's official made public a letter written by Reddy to the Chief Justice of India, SA Bobde on October 6 making certain allegations against Justice Ramana. </p>.<p>Reddy, in his letter, had alleged that Justice Ramana had been influencing the judicial affairs at Andhra Pradesh High Court including calling the shots on roster of certain High Court judges.</p><p>It was also alleged that cases important to the opposition Telugu Desam Party were “allocated to a few judges”.</p>.<p><em>"By the conduct of Reddy, the faith of public at large is shaken. Because his conduct is nothing but an attempt to de-stabilise the duly established democratic setup of our country,"</em> Singh's petition in Supreme Court states.</p><p>He has contended that <em>"the act of Reddy calls for immediate action from this court to tackle this unprecedented situation."</em></p><p>Guidelines may be framed to tackle and handle such irresponsible activities, the plea added.</p>.Andhra CM crossed limits by going on street to allege judicial impropriety: Plea filed in SC in wake of Jaganmohan Reddy's allegations.<p>Attorney General KK Venugopal had earlier refused to reconsider his decision to decline consent for contempt proceedings against Andhra Reddy and his principal advisor Ajeya Kallam who had made the contentious letter to CJI public for making allegations against judges.</p><p>The request was raised by Bharatiya Janata Party leader and lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay on November 5.</p>.Conduct of Andhra CM and his advisor "contumacious": AG KK Venugopal declines consent for contempt against YS Jaganmohan Reddy.<p>The attorney general had said that the CJI was aware of the matter and it would be, therefore, inappropriate for him to give consent and “preclude the determination of the Chief Justice of India on the matter”. </p>.<p>The plea in SC contended that the timing of the allegation was "highly suspicious and doubtful" as the judge is in the service of the Indian judiciary for long but Reddy preferred not to disclose those charges earlier.<br></p>
<p>Supreme Court judge, Justice <strong>UU Lalit, </strong>on Monday, recused from hearing a plea seeking action against Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister, YS Jaganmohan Reddy for raising allegations against Supreme Court judge, Justice NV Ramana.</p>.<p>The plea came up before a Bench which also comprised Justices <strong>Vineet Saran </strong>and <strong>Ravindra Bhat,</strong> when Justice Lalit remarked:</p>.<blockquote>"As a lawyer, I had represented these parties in litigation. I cannot take up this matter. Let this matter be listed at the earliest before any other judge decided by the CJI."</blockquote>.<p>The court was hearing three separate petitions seeking inquiry and action against the Chief Minister for his ‘scandalizing’ remarks against the second senior-most judge of the top court, Justice NV Ramana. </p>.Remove Andhra Pradesh CM Jaganmohan Reddy from post for making "scandalising" remarks against sitting judge: PIL in Supreme Court.<p>The petitioners, who are three advocates <strong>GS Mani, Pradeep Kumar Yadav </strong>and <strong>Sunil Kumar Singh </strong>and NGO <strong>Anti-Corruption Council of India Trust </strong>have submitted that the allegations levelled by Reddy against Justice Ramana are baseless. They have also highlighted that Reddy is facing over 20 criminal cases. </p>.<p>Petitioners have sought a judicial inquiry by an internal committee headed by sitting or retired judges of the Supreme Court or any authority including the Central Bureau of Investigation, into the allegations raised by the Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister. </p>.<p>Advocate Sunil Kumar Singh, in his petition, has asked the top court to issue a show cause to Reddy after his government's official made public a letter written by Reddy to the Chief Justice of India, SA Bobde on October 6 making certain allegations against Justice Ramana. </p>.<p>Reddy, in his letter, had alleged that Justice Ramana had been influencing the judicial affairs at Andhra Pradesh High Court including calling the shots on roster of certain High Court judges.</p><p>It was also alleged that cases important to the opposition Telugu Desam Party were “allocated to a few judges”.</p>.<p><em>"By the conduct of Reddy, the faith of public at large is shaken. Because his conduct is nothing but an attempt to de-stabilise the duly established democratic setup of our country,"</em> Singh's petition in Supreme Court states.</p><p>He has contended that <em>"the act of Reddy calls for immediate action from this court to tackle this unprecedented situation."</em></p><p>Guidelines may be framed to tackle and handle such irresponsible activities, the plea added.</p>.Andhra CM crossed limits by going on street to allege judicial impropriety: Plea filed in SC in wake of Jaganmohan Reddy's allegations.<p>Attorney General KK Venugopal had earlier refused to reconsider his decision to decline consent for contempt proceedings against Andhra Reddy and his principal advisor Ajeya Kallam who had made the contentious letter to CJI public for making allegations against judges.</p><p>The request was raised by Bharatiya Janata Party leader and lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay on November 5.</p>.Conduct of Andhra CM and his advisor "contumacious": AG KK Venugopal declines consent for contempt against YS Jaganmohan Reddy.<p>The attorney general had said that the CJI was aware of the matter and it would be, therefore, inappropriate for him to give consent and “preclude the determination of the Chief Justice of India on the matter”. </p>.<p>The plea in SC contended that the timing of the allegation was "highly suspicious and doubtful" as the judge is in the service of the Indian judiciary for long but Reddy preferred not to disclose those charges earlier.<br></p>
