Section 498A IPC being increasingly used to settle personal scores with husband, relatives: Supreme Court

Relatives of the husband cannot be forced to undergo trial for the offence of cruelty under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code based on omnibus allegations of dowry harassment by the wife, the Supreme Court observed on Tuesday [Kahkashan Kausar vs State of Bihar]..A Bench of Justices S Abdul Nazeer and Krishna Murari stated that the Supreme Court in varied instances have held that a criminal trial leading to an eventual acquittal also inflicts severe scars upon the and such an exercise must therefore be discouraged."General and omnibus allegations cannot manifest in a situation where the relatives of the complainant’s husband are forced to undergo trial. It has been highlighted by this court in varied instances, that a criminal trial leading to an eventual acquittal also inflicts severe scars upon the and such an exercise must therefore be discouraged," the Court said.Pertinently, the Court also expressed its concern over the tendency to employ Section 498A to settle personal scores against the husband and his relatives.The Bench said that in recent times, matrimonial litigation in the country has increased significantly and there is a greater disaffection and friction surrounding the institution of marriage, now, more than ever."This has resulted in an increased tendency to employ provisions such as 498A IPC as instruments to settle personal scores against the husband and his relatives," the judgment said..The top court was dealing with an appeal against a Patna High Court judgment which had refused to quash a first information report (FIR) against the in-laws under Sections 341 (wrongful restraint), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 379 (theft), 354 (assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty) 498A (husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty) of IPC.The wife had alleged that she was being mentally tortured and that her in laws were threatening her for terminating the pregnancy..However, the top court noted that they were all general allegations."The complainant alleged that ‘all accused harassed her mentally and threatened her of terminating her pregnancy’. Furthermore, no specific and distinct allegations have been made against either of the Appellants herein, i.e., none of the Appellants have been attributed any specific role in furtherance of the general allegations made against them," the Court noted..The Court also stated that it has previously on numerous occasions, expressed concern over the misuse of section 498A IPC and the increased tendency of implicating relatives of the husband in matrimonial disputes, without analysing the long term ramifications of a trial on the complainant as well as the accused.."False implication by way of general omnibus allegations made in the course of matrimonial dispute, if left unchecked would result in misuse of the process of law," the Bench underscored.It also noted how the top court had on many occasions warned courts below from proceeding against the relatives and in-laws of the husband when no prima facie case is made out against them..The Court, therefore quashed the FIR against the in-laws stating that allowing prosecution in the "absence of clear allegations against the appellants would simply result in an abuse of the process of law.".[Read Judgment]