<p style="text-align: justify;">A few days after 75 lawyers were designated as Senior Advocates, a petition has been filed before the Allahabad High Court challenging the same.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">The plea by the Advocate <span style="color: #993366;">Vishnu Bihari Tiwari</span> has alleged that the selection norms put in place by the Supreme Court were ignored in the process adopted by the High Court.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">The petitioner had approached a Division Bench of Justice <strong>Shashi Kant Gupta</strong> and <strong>Pankaj Bhatia</strong> for early hearing. The same was rejected by the Bench, which stated that the petition would get listed as per Court rules.</p>.<p>The matter is likely to be heard on May 23.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">The main grievance is non-compliance with the guidelines in Supreme Court’s judgment in <span style="color: #993366;"><a href="https://barandbench.com/supreme-court-notifies-senior-designation-guidelines-ten-months-judgment-read-guidelines/" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color: #993366;" target="_blank"><em>Indira Jaising v. Union of India.</em></a></span></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">It is also understood that one of the members of the scrutiny committee (a Senior Advocate) had sent a note that guidelines have not been followed while screening applications and making the shortlist.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">On May 18, the Allahabad High Court conferred the Senior gown on 75 advocates.</p>.<table style="background-color: #eddfdf;"><tbody><tr><td><h3><a href="https://barandbench.com/allahabad-high-court-73-senior-advocates/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Allahabad High Court</strong> designates <strong>75 lawyers</strong> as <strong>Senior Advocates</strong></a></h3></td></tr></tbody></table>.<p style="text-align: justify;">The petition in the Allahabad High Court follows similar challenges made with respect to Senior designations made by the<span style="color: #993366;"><a href="https://barandbench.com/karnataka-high-court-issues-notice-in-senior-designations-challenge/" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color: #993366;" target="_blank"> Karnataka High Court</a></span>, the Delhi High Court and the Calcutta High Court. The Calcutta High Court had even <span style="color: #993366;"><a href="https://barandbench.com/calcutta-hc-ammendment-senior-desgination-guidelines/" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color: #993366;" target="_blank">directed amendments to the guidelines</a></span> notified in July 2018. The Delhi High Court recently <span style="color: #993366;"><a href="https://barandbench.com/delhi-hc-stays-rule-mandating-joint-proposal-by-three-senior-advocates-for-senior-designation-application/" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color: #993366;" target="_blank">scrapped the rule regarding joint proposal</a></span> by Senior Advocates as a prerequisite for applying for the Senior gown.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">Another petition is also pending in the Supreme Court. Filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, <span style="color: #993366;"><a href="https://barandbench.com/indira-jaising-revisited-senior-designation-guidelines-notified-by-high-courts-challenged-in-sc/" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color: #993366;" target="_blank">the plea challenges the Senior Designation guidelines</a></span> notified by twenty-four high courts across the country.</p>.<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://bit.ly/2Tq7twI" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #993366;">Bar & Bench</span> <span style="color: #000000;">is available on</span> <span style="color: #339966;">WhatsApp</span>. <span style="color: #000000;">For real-time updates on stories, click here</span></strong><span style="color: #000000;"><strong> to subscribe to our WhatsApp.</strong></span></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A few days after 75 lawyers were designated as Senior Advocates, a petition has been filed before the Allahabad High Court challenging the same.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">The plea by the Advocate <span style="color: #993366;">Vishnu Bihari Tiwari</span> has alleged that the selection norms put in place by the Supreme Court were ignored in the process adopted by the High Court.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">The petitioner had approached a Division Bench of Justice <strong>Shashi Kant Gupta</strong> and <strong>Pankaj Bhatia</strong> for early hearing. The same was rejected by the Bench, which stated that the petition would get listed as per Court rules.</p>.<p>The matter is likely to be heard on May 23.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">The main grievance is non-compliance with the guidelines in Supreme Court’s judgment in <span style="color: #993366;"><a href="https://barandbench.com/supreme-court-notifies-senior-designation-guidelines-ten-months-judgment-read-guidelines/" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color: #993366;" target="_blank"><em>Indira Jaising v. Union of India.</em></a></span></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">It is also understood that one of the members of the scrutiny committee (a Senior Advocate) had sent a note that guidelines have not been followed while screening applications and making the shortlist.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">On May 18, the Allahabad High Court conferred the Senior gown on 75 advocates.</p>.<table style="background-color: #eddfdf;"><tbody><tr><td><h3><a href="https://barandbench.com/allahabad-high-court-73-senior-advocates/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Allahabad High Court</strong> designates <strong>75 lawyers</strong> as <strong>Senior Advocates</strong></a></h3></td></tr></tbody></table>.<p style="text-align: justify;">The petition in the Allahabad High Court follows similar challenges made with respect to Senior designations made by the<span style="color: #993366;"><a href="https://barandbench.com/karnataka-high-court-issues-notice-in-senior-designations-challenge/" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color: #993366;" target="_blank"> Karnataka High Court</a></span>, the Delhi High Court and the Calcutta High Court. The Calcutta High Court had even <span style="color: #993366;"><a href="https://barandbench.com/calcutta-hc-ammendment-senior-desgination-guidelines/" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color: #993366;" target="_blank">directed amendments to the guidelines</a></span> notified in July 2018. The Delhi High Court recently <span style="color: #993366;"><a href="https://barandbench.com/delhi-hc-stays-rule-mandating-joint-proposal-by-three-senior-advocates-for-senior-designation-application/" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color: #993366;" target="_blank">scrapped the rule regarding joint proposal</a></span> by Senior Advocates as a prerequisite for applying for the Senior gown.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">Another petition is also pending in the Supreme Court. Filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, <span style="color: #993366;"><a href="https://barandbench.com/indira-jaising-revisited-senior-designation-guidelines-notified-by-high-courts-challenged-in-sc/" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color: #993366;" target="_blank">the plea challenges the Senior Designation guidelines</a></span> notified by twenty-four high courts across the country.</p>.<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://bit.ly/2Tq7twI" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #993366;">Bar & Bench</span> <span style="color: #000000;">is available on</span> <span style="color: #339966;">WhatsApp</span>. <span style="color: #000000;">For real-time updates on stories, click here</span></strong><span style="color: #000000;"><strong> to subscribe to our WhatsApp.</strong></span></a></p>