Search Results

The Court upheld the trial court order quashing the CBI notice seeking details about phone numbers, bank accounts and domestic staff used by Quddusi in 2017.

The Court restrained Sambhawaami Studios LLP and other unidentified infringers from creating, publishing or sharing AI-generated or deepfake content using Akira Nandan’s identity,

Azad has filed a defamation case against Verma over her social media post calling him a blot on the uniform.

The Court rendered these findings as it set aside the freezing of bank accounts belonging to Malabar Gold and Diamond Limited.

A person suffering from hypertension cannot be shut out from disability pension merely by making assumptions about his lifestyle instead of having it properly evaluated by a medical board, the Court h ...

PhysicsWallah had moved the Court alleging that its former employee, Nikhil Singh, who now runs a rival coaching platform, has been making defamatory comments online about the edtech firm.

Reliance Realty and Campion Properties have approached the High Court challenging ED's provisional attachment of their assets in money laundering probe.

"It is because we expressed ourselves strongly that we got excellent response from the Bar," the Court said today.

In 2016, the CBI filed a case against the then-senior civil judge on allegations of bribery. The ED's money laundering case is connected to these allegations.

The government told the Court that people affected by Indigo flight cancellations have been refunded and that process for compensation is underway.

Educated and independent adults must be aware of the inherent uncertainties attached to relationships, the Court said.

Fortis consistently disputed the authenticity and execution of documents, maintaining that the term sheet was never signed by its then CEO Bhavdeep Singh.

The Court warned that it may make observations and pass an order which will damage Pande’s career.

The Court was hearing a petition filed by the parents of a NLU Delhi law student who died by suicide in September 2024.

The Court relied on In re Sushant Rohilla, in which it was held that lack of attendance does not constitute a valid ground for detention.

The Court underscored that it was not in the public interest for the seats to stay vacant.