Search Results

The Court directed the High Court, the BCI, the BCD and the DHCBA to explain how the Rules can be justified.

Priya Kapur's lawyer rebuffed her mother-in-law's claim that there was concealment of assets.

The petition seeks a stay on the notification appointing November 21, 2025 as the date of the Industrial Relations Code coming into force.

A PIL was filed in the Court stating that the blast was an attack on India's symbol of sovereignty and the victims' family are still looking for the reasons behind the attack.

The Court held that employment contracts remain contracts of personal service even where they contain confidentiality or non-compete clauses.

The Court opined that an eco-park sought to be developed by the TN government on land earlier leased to the Madras Race Club in Chennai was the "need of the hour".

The Court ordered Google and Meta to provide Choudhary with details of the video uploaders.

The High Court highlighted concerns about repeated procedural and legal lapses in Judge Harish Kumar’s handling of matrimonial matters.

Justice on Trial had filed a ₹10,000 crore defamation suit against the BBC for its two-part documentary titled India: The Modi Question.

Powers under Section 37 of FEMA are civil in nature and governed by powers similar to those available under the Income Tax Act, the Court said.

Rani Kapur said that Sunjay's Will bequeathing all his assets to Rani is suspicious and because they were married only for seven years.

The parents had raised concerns that the film reconstructs covert missions and personal details about Major Sharma without authorization from his family or the Indian army.

The Court was hearing an application seeking recall of the injunction granted to Woodland and the consequential seizure of shoes from the applicant's premises.

The Court directed the Central government and CCI to file their responses in a week and posted the case for further hearing on December 16 at 2.30 pm.

"A judge is a judge, wherever she/he is placed in the judicial hierarchy and cannot be treated in the manner as was done in the present case," the High Court said.

Assam Rifles were treated at par with Indian Army till the Third Central Pay Commission, but the status changed after the recommendations of the Fourth Pay Commission.