Search Results

The controversy arose from proceedings initiated by the RoC alleging that Nadella and others had failed to disclose themselves as significant beneficial owners in LinkedIn India.

A trial court had rejected Malik's bail plea on January 29 this year.

Justice Subramonium Prasad said that the content flagged by Chadha prima facie did not reveal any violation of personality rights and asked him to amend his suit to a defamation case.

The Court held that a patent owner cannot claim royalty payments merely by saying that its technology is essential to a product sold by others; it must prove actual patent use and infringement.

The Court held that under Section 2(p) of the Copyright Act, the term “musical work” does not include lyrics or sound recordings. It only covers the musical component of a song.

Justice Subramonium Prasad to hear the matter on Thursday.

The petitioner withdrew the plea today, seeking liberty to avail other remedies.

If a codified mechanism is in place, it would ease the difficulties faced by a litigant seeking a refund of the court fee, the Bench observed.

To buttress his case, the petitioner referred to the recent observations made by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma against Kejriwal and other AAP leaders.

The Court remarked that the movie may be a work of fiction, but the concerns raised by a security force personnel can't be said to be bereft of any material.

Ambani is seeking the takedown of allegedly defamatory news content concerning ongoing CBI and ED investigations against his Reliance companies.

The YouTuber was found guilty of having made comments that lowered the dignity of the judiciary.

Students were picked up by the Delhi Police in March 2026 on allegations that they were involved in the disappearance of a girl and for supporting Maoist/Naxalite ideologies.

The residents association argued that the action overlooked the area’s historical and cultural significance and proceeded without due process.

The Court passed the interim order on May 15 in a copyright infringement suit filed by Ivy Entertainment Private Limited

In the Sushant Rohilla case, the Court held that law students with attendance shortage couldn't be prevented from writing exams.