Search Results

The Court held that the question of when a multi-party agreement is executed must be determined with reference to the nature of the instrument and the signatures required to complete it.

Mere inclusion of an interest component in an instrument cannot result in an enhanced stamp duty liability, the Court ruled.

Taxmann alleged that Commercial had copied hundreds of its headnotes across eight publications, including Income Tax Act, 1961 and Direct Tax Law and Practice, Search and Seizure.

The High Court also sought an explanation regarding the remark made by the judicial magistrate that the court was working ‘with only one stenographer and had a pendency of more than 4,500 cases’.

The ECI made the submission in response to a plea seeking a prompt decision on an application to register Waris Punjab De as a political party.

The Court recorded the government's statement and said no direction was required to be passed on Club's plea seeking stay on eviction and de-recognition orders.

The Court held that Unity could not bypass the shareholders' agreement requiring BharatPe's consent for changes to the bank's capital structure.

The controversy concerns how courts identify territorial connection and whether they can turn away a suit after accepting that they have jurisdiction to hear it.

The case involves allegations of corruption in the procurement of medicines, surgical items, equipment and linen by the Delhi government's Central Procurement Agency.

The Court decreed the suit filed by the veteran actor in 2022.

Justice Singh also called for CPC reforms, greater use of AI in courts and stronger legal protection for trade secrets.

The posts are offensive and hurt the very dignity of the Chief Minister, the High Court said.

The High Court lifted the blanket ban imposed by the trial court on the sale and circulation of a book.

In a 246-page judgment delivered on November 3, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav had said that the Court's territorial jurisdiction was stalling intellectual property suits.

Justice Manmeet Arora transferred the case from her court after observing that the lawyer may now try to influence the client and instigate frivolous allegations against her.

Justice Amit Mahajan passed the order on a petition filed by the Delhi High Court Bar Association.