Justice Madhu Jain ruled that DNA evidence is significant since it establishes the fact of sexual intercourse between the parties, but it does not provide the circumstances in which the intercourse to ...
A ₹11 crore defamation suit has been filed against Kavitha for her allegations that the 160-year-old daily was secretly acquired by KTR and now reflects BRS' views.
The Court made the observation while refusing to entertain a plea to halt a demolition drive of certain jhuggies flagged as encroaching on public footpaths.