The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed an advocate’s plea challenging a Madras High Court order rejecting his plea for listing of 21 pending cases filed by him on behalf of his clients [LK Charles Alexander v. Registrar General, Madras High Court].
A bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and Aparesh Kumar Singh declined to interfere with the High Court’s decision.
“The registry works under the orders of whom? Tell us. Have you ever seen what the cause list says at the end? Published under the orders of the Chief Justice. You want a direction to the Chief Justice. Dismissed,” Justice Nath said.
Advocate LK Charles Alexander told the Court that he had filed a writ petition before the High Court seeking directions for the listing of the cases pending there.
“You filed a writ of mandamus before the High Court to direct other courts to take up your matters?” Justice Nath asked.
“To direct the registry, My Lords,” Alexander clarified.
Justice Nath then asked whether Alexander was a lawyer. After he answered in the affirmative, the Court dismissed his plea.
Alexander had approached the Madras High Court alleging that 21 cases filed by him on behalf of his clients had not been listed despite repeated requests to the registry.
On July 3, a division bench of Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G Arul Murugan dismissed his petition, holding that writ petitions could not be used to bypass established listing procedures.
The High Court said that lawyers and litigants had no vested or fundamental right to have their matters listed ahead of earlier-filed cases, except by following the prescribed procedure for seeking urgent listing.
It pointed out that Alexander could submit a mention memo before the bench handling the relevant roster or make a representation to the Registrar (Judicial) regarding any listing discrepancies.
Alexander subsequently challenged the judgment before the Supreme Court.
[Read Live Coverage]