<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Updates from Supreme Court – <span style="color: #993366;">Day 2</span></strong></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">After an <span style="color: #993366;"><a href="https://barandbench.com/aadhaar-income-tax-supreme-court-2/" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color: #993366;" target="_blank">eventful Day 1</a></span>, Senior Advocate Shyam Divan commenced his arguments on Day 2 on making #Aadhaar mandatory for filing Income Tax Returns.</p>.<ol style="text-align: justify;"><li>Shyam Divan rattling off statistics on identity theft in<span style="color: #993366;"> <a class="twitter-hashtag pretty-link js-nav" data-query-source="hashtag_click" dir="ltr" href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Aadhaar?src=hash" style="color: #993366;"><s>#</s><b>Aadhaar</b></a></span> arguments; quotes the Angela Merkel example</li><li>“[Is the state] by an electronic leash, going to walk us around like a dog for the rest of our life?”</li><li>“Seems like Shyam Divan wants stealthily slip in arguments on privacy issues in #Aadhaar” AG Rohatgi objects vociferously</li><li>“Nowhere in the world such number tagging is done. It used to happen in [Nazi] concentration camps”</li><li>Sr. adv. Shyam Divan cites doctrine of informed consent as a barrier to leaking of sensitive data like fingerprints</li><li>The very object of the provision is discriminatory, between persons who have parted with bio metrics and those who don’t</li><li>Day 2 hearing concludes; To resume tomorrow, Shyam Divan to continue.</li></ol>.<p style="text-align: justify;">Gautam Bhatia (@<span class="username u-dir" dir="ltr"><a class="ProfileHeaderCard-screennameLink u-linkComplex js-nav" href="https://twitter.com/gautambhatia88" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<b class="u-linkComplex-target">gautambhatia88</b></a>)</span>, Advocate, has been live tweeting each of the arguments from the Supreme Court. Here are his tweets (<em>Best to read from bottom up</em>)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Updates from Supreme Court – <span style="color: #993366;">Day 2</span></strong></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">After an <span style="color: #993366;"><a href="https://barandbench.com/aadhaar-income-tax-supreme-court-2/" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="color: #993366;" target="_blank">eventful Day 1</a></span>, Senior Advocate Shyam Divan commenced his arguments on Day 2 on making #Aadhaar mandatory for filing Income Tax Returns.</p>.<ol style="text-align: justify;"><li>Shyam Divan rattling off statistics on identity theft in<span style="color: #993366;"> <a class="twitter-hashtag pretty-link js-nav" data-query-source="hashtag_click" dir="ltr" href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Aadhaar?src=hash" style="color: #993366;"><s>#</s><b>Aadhaar</b></a></span> arguments; quotes the Angela Merkel example</li><li>“[Is the state] by an electronic leash, going to walk us around like a dog for the rest of our life?”</li><li>“Seems like Shyam Divan wants stealthily slip in arguments on privacy issues in #Aadhaar” AG Rohatgi objects vociferously</li><li>“Nowhere in the world such number tagging is done. It used to happen in [Nazi] concentration camps”</li><li>Sr. adv. Shyam Divan cites doctrine of informed consent as a barrier to leaking of sensitive data like fingerprints</li><li>The very object of the provision is discriminatory, between persons who have parted with bio metrics and those who don’t</li><li>Day 2 hearing concludes; To resume tomorrow, Shyam Divan to continue.</li></ol>.<p style="text-align: justify;">Gautam Bhatia (@<span class="username u-dir" dir="ltr"><a class="ProfileHeaderCard-screennameLink u-linkComplex js-nav" href="https://twitter.com/gautambhatia88" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<b class="u-linkComplex-target">gautambhatia88</b></a>)</span>, Advocate, has been live tweeting each of the arguments from the Supreme Court. Here are his tweets (<em>Best to read from bottom up</em>)</p>
