Delhi High Court delivers split verdict on jailed MP Engineer Rashid's plea on travel expenses to Parliament

The Baramulla MP had said that he was being charged ₹1.44 lakh per day for security and travel arrangements to go to parliament from Tihar jail.
Engineer Rashid, Delhi HC
Engineer Rashid, Delhi HC
Published on
2 min read

The Delhi High Court on Friday delivered a split verdict on a plea filed by jailed Baramulla Member of Parliament Engineer Rashid seeking directions to the Central government to bear the expenses of his travel to the parliament from Tihar jail where he is currently lodged as an undertrial prisoner.

While Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani said that government should pay for Rashid's travel, Justice Vivek Chaudhary said the government need not bear the expenses.

“We have not been able to concur on the manner in which the application is to be disposed of. There are divergent and discordant views,” Justice Bhambhani said while delivering the verdict. 

The matter will now be placed before Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya.

 Justice Vivek Chaudhary and Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani
Justice Vivek Chaudhary and Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani

Rashid is currently in Tihar Jail as an accused in a terror funding case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). He was arrested in 2019.

He won the Baramulla Lok Sabha seat in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls by defeating current Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah by over two lakh votes. 

He initially moved the trial court seeking directions to the government to allow him to attend the parliament.

The trial court allowed him to attend the parliament on certain days but said that he would have to bear the expenses of his travel and security provided by the government authorities.

He then moved the High Court against the trial court order.

He stated that he was being charged ₹17 lakh for 12 days at the rate of 1.44 lakh per day for security and travel arrangements from Tihar jail to parliament and back.

"You are saddling me with ₹17 lakh cost to represent the public at large? I am losing every day. I have gone there before. You have sent me earlier on two occasions. I was allowed by this Court,” Senior Advocate N Hariharan, appearing for Rashid, said.

Senior Advocate N Hariharan, along with advocates Vikhyat Oberoi, Nishita Gupta, Shivam Prakash, Ravi Sharma, Punya Rekha Angara, Aman Akhtar, Vinayak Gautam, Vasudhara and Hashain Khawaja appeared for Engineer Rashid.

NIA was represented through Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra, Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Akshai Malik and advocate Khawar Saleem.

Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
www.barandbench.com