Bombay High Court grants interim relief to Indian Express in ₹100 crore defamation suit against online news portal

The Bombay High Court recently granted interim relief to the Indian Express Group in a ₹100 crore defamation suit filed by it against the owners of e-paper, Sprouts (defendants). .The respondents had allegedly published a defamatory report against Girish Kuber who is the Editor in Chief of Loksatta, the Marathi newspaper of Express group.Justice Manish Pitale directed the defendants to delete, take down and remove the defaming news reports from their web page and social media platforms. The Court also directed the website to refrain from republishing, reposting, uploading, forwarding and/or circulating the offending articles.Indian Express moved the Court seeking ₹100 crore in damages after reports published by the defendants alleged that Kuber had attended a lunch with Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis and had received a gift from Fadnavis.The articles alleged that Kuber had compromised the principles of journalism.The suit also made WhatsApp, Meta Platforms and Twitter as party to ensure compliance of court orders. Advocate Abhinav Chandrachud, appearing for Express Group, pointed out that other than claiming that Kuber’s action resulted in comprising the high standards of journalism, there was no other justification given in the articles. Justice Pitale observed that there was not even prima facie justification offered by the defendants for publishing the news reports in its e-paper. The court also did not find any details about the alleged compromise to the high standards of journalism due to Kuber’s actions. “According to defendant, merely because Kuber, who is an editor, attended an event hosted by the Deputy Chief Minister, it was enough to make such allegations against plaintiffs. It is also noted by this Court that no material is placed on record on behalf of defendants to indicate as to the nature of articles or other material allegedly brought into the public domain by the plaintiffs for benefiting the deputy Chief Minister or other politicians as a quid pro quo for having attended the aforesaid event. There does not appear to be any justification placed before this court.” the 12 page order recorded. .Justice Pitale, therefore, directed the defendants to take down the defaming news reports from their page and even the cache and archives from their page and cache and archives of Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter and other social media platforms..The Court also ordered that in the event the two individuals fail to comply with the directions, the social media intermediaries could be asked to take appropriate steps in the matter to ensure compliance. Chandrachud conceded that directions pertaining to compliance may not apply to WhatsApp LLC, as individuals sending messages on the platform could perhaps not be injuncted or controlled by it due to the very nature on its platform. The Court accepted this position..Chandrachud with advocates Pranit Kulkarni, Tejaswi Ghag, Shivam Singh briefed by Poorvi Kamani appeared for Express group. Advocates Vishal Shriyan, Arsalan Thaver appeared for WhatsApp. Advocates Akash Menon and Bency Ramakrishnan appeared for Meta.Advocates Alankar Kirpekar and Ayush Tiwari briefed by MAG legal appeared for Twitter..[Read Order].Follow Bar and Bench channel on WhatsAppDownload the Bar and Bench Mobile app for instant access to the latest legal news.