"Does not make any sense": Delhi High Court on policy barring married men and women from recruitment as Judge Advocate General

The Court asked the Central government how the marital status of a person and the training for the JAG department have any correlation.

Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday took an unfavourable view of the government policy which bars married men or women from being considered for the Judge Advocate General (JAG) department, the legal wing of the army [Kush Kalra v Union of India and Anr].

Loading content, please wait...

Delhi High Court

Justice Subramonium Prasad

Judge Advocate General

Indian Army

Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma