Anti-vaxxers, contrary views of High Courts and more: The Madras High Court hearing in the Online Rummy ban challenge

Chief Justice Banerjee recalled that he had recently expressed doubts over whether a person has a right to refuse to take COVID-19 vaccination, and compared it to a recent Meghalaya HC order taking a contrary view.
Madras High Court
Madras High Court

Monday's Madras High Court hearing in petitions challenging the Tamil Nadu government's ban on online rummy saw interesting comments being made on the extent to which a State can exercise paternalistic authority, including when it comes to mandating vaccination (Junglee Games India Private Limited and anr v. State of Tamil Nadu).

Want to read the full story?

We’re glad you’re enjoying this story. Subscribe to any of our plans to continue reading the story.

Already have an account? Sign In

Related Stories

No stories found.
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news