Some meaningful study ought to have taken place before demonetisation: Shyam Divan argues before Supreme Court

Divan added that while secrecy of a decision like demonetisation was important, it did not mean that even a minimum impact assessment could not have been carried out.
Senior Adv Shyam Divan and Supreme Court
Senior Adv Shyam Divan and Supreme Court

Senior Advocate Shyam Divan argued before the Supreme Court on Friday that the Central government ought to have carried out a meaningful study before implementing demonetisation in 2016 [Vivek Narayan Sharma v. Union of India].

Want to read the full story?

We’re glad you’re enjoying this story. Subscribe to any of our plans to continue reading the story.

Already have an account? Sign In

Related Stories

No stories found.
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news