The logic of the NALSA judgment is directly contrary to that of Naz – Senior Advocate Raju Ramachandran

The logic of the NALSA judgment is directly contrary to that of Naz – Senior Advocate Raju Ramachandran

Senior Advocate Raju Ramachandran was the arguing counsel in the NALSA case, a recent decision of the Supreme Court upholding the Constitutional and legal rights of transgenders. In this interview with Bar & Bench the senior counsel expounds his views on the judgment especially viewed in the backdrop of another recent judgement of the Supreme Court upholding the constitutional validity of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Want to read the full story?

We’re glad you’re enjoying this story. Subscribe to any of our plans to continue reading the story.

Already have an account? Sign In

Related Stories

No stories found.
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
www.barandbench.com