Naz Foundation

Section 377: Naz Foundation withdraws Curative Petition against 2013 SC Verdict in view of 2018 Verdict
Reporter’s Diary: Why two former SC judges deserve credit for the Section 377 verdict
image-fallback
“If we say there is Right to Privacy, judgment in Naz Foundation could become vulnerable”, DY Chandrachud J.
image-fallback
NAZ curative listed for February 2; Will the Supreme Court reverse its S.377 ruling? (Read petition)
image-fallback
The logic of the NALSA judgment is directly contrary to that of Naz – Senior Advocate Raju Ramachandran
Desai, Salve, Rohatgi, Grover battle for Naz Foundation’s curative petition; SC agrees to “consider” request for open hearing
Supreme Court rejects Naz Foundation Review Petition; Says no reason for interference made out
Government files review petition in SC on S.377 verdict; Claims Apex Court verdict is “legally unsustainable”
“The Legislature has to seriously consider whether S. 377 should be kept in the statute book” – Senior Advocate V Giri
“We were expecting to win but not in the same manner as we had won in the Delhi High Court” – Anand Grover on the S.377 Judgment
Justice G.S. Singhvi: From 2G to Koushal
The Supreme Court’s 377 Decision: Anti-minority Subjectivity and Unintelligible Conclusions
Supreme Court sets aside Delhi High Court judgment in Naz Foundation; Declares S.377 to be constitutional [Download Judgment]
Naz Foundation: Supreme Court to pronounce verdict on constitutionality of S. 377 tomorrow
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
www.barandbench.com