Supreme Court.1. Digvijaya Singh v. State of M.P. & Others.[Item 62 in court 1 – Writ Petition (Civil) 417/2015].Bench: Chief Justice HL Dattu, C Nagappan J., Amitava Roy J. .The petition pertaining to Vyapam scam. Pursuant to the Court’s order, the CBI is in the process of taking over the investigation of all cases related to the scam. During the last hearing, the Court had given the CBI three weeks time to take over all cases related to the scam and to complete appointment of public prosecutors to conduct its cases before the trial courts..Today in court: The Court was not pleased when Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar informed the Bench that the process of CBI taking over cases and appointment of public prosecutors is not complete. He submitted that the CBI is yet to take over the investigation in 72 cases and only 19 out of the 48 requisite prosecutors have been appointed..The Court has now given CBI another three weeks time to complete the process. The CBI has also been directed to file a status report on the next hearing date which is October 9..2. Harsh Mander v. Union of India & Ors..[Item 10 in court 6 – Writ Petiton (Crl) 158/2015].Bench: Jasti Chelameswar J., Abhay Manohar Sapre J. .This is a petition seeking a court-monitored investigation into the allegations made by Special Public Prosecutor for National Investigating Agency, that she was asked to go “soft” on certain accused in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case..When the matter was listed for hearing last week, Justice Lalit had recused from the case citing conflict of interest..Today in court: The Court issued notice to the Centre, Maharashtra government and the National Investigating Agency and directed them to file their response within one week. The court, however, turned down the interim prayer of the petitioners to stay the proceedings in the bail applications of the accused..3. N Mohan v. The District Judge, Tiruvannamalai District & Ors..[Item 29 in court1 – SLP (Civil)…/2015].Bench: Chief Justice HL Dattu, C Nagappan J., Amitava Roy J. .Check evening updates to know more about this case..Today in court: This case, which is a service matter of a law clerk employed in Tamil Nadu, was dismissed..4. Star India Pvt Ltd v. Akuate Internet Services Pvt Ltd & Ors..[Item 204 in court 2 – SLP(C) NO. 29629/2013].Bench: TS Thakur J.,Gopala Gowda J. .This is a part heard appeal filed by STAR India against a Delhi HC judgment that had precluded STAR and BCCI from asserting any exclusive rights over cricket and match information. The court held that STAR could not resort to the narrow confines of “hot news doctrine” with respect to match information. STAR had then come in appeal to the Supreme Court contending that they have ‘property rights’ over cricket match information against competitors who were commercially exploiting such match information by disseminating it through SMS alerts, for a fee..Today in court: This case could not be tracked..5. Common Cause v. Abhijat & Ors.[Item 9 in court 13 – Conmt.Pet. (Civil) 550/2015 in Writ Petition (Civil) 821/1990].Bench: Kurian Joseph J., Arun Mishra J. .Check evening updates to know more about this case..Today in court: This case is a contempt petition filed by NGO Common Cause against the Delhi High Court Bar Association and District Bar Associations The petitioner has contended that the Bar bodies resorting to strike recently was in violation of the Supreme Court judgment in Harish Uppal’s case. The Court admitted the matter. You can read the full report here..6. Nirmaljeet Singh & Ors. v. Bar Council of India & Ors..[Item 62 in court 8 – SLP(C) No. 25712/2015].Bench: Ranjan Gogoi J., NV Ramana J. .Check evening updates to know more about this case..Today in court: This case could not be tracked. Any lead/ information would be appreciated..7. Union of India v. Reliance Communications Ltd. Etc.[Item 7 in court 4 – C.A. NO. 6183-6255/2015].Bench: JS Khehar J., R Banumathi J. .A fresh civil appeal. Check evening updates to know more about this case..Today in court: This case could not be tracked. Any lead/ information would be appreciated..Delhi High Court.Manohar Lal Sharma Advocate v. Union of India & Ors. .[Item 6, Court 1- WP (Crl) 2001/2015].Bench: Chief Justice, Jayant Nath J..A fresh petition. Check evening updates to know more about this case.