"It has become regular practice to make allegations against the advocate without making the advocate a party and without taking any action against the advocate," the Court noted.
The Court found that a terrorist gang was formed to avenge the alleged dishonour of their faith by the deceased and to strike terror into the hearts and minds of general public.
The Court added that such a person cannot be forced to stay back in the protection home merely because she might return to sex work if released without counselling and training.
The ruling was passed on a trademark infringement suit filed by the owner of Shaadi.com against Ammanamanchi Lalitha Rani, an operator of a competing website under the name getshaadi.com.
A single judge Bench had earlier stayed coercive action by banks against Anil Ambani on finding that a forensic audit report cited against him to classify his account as fraudulent was not signed by a ...