According to the plea, the bank ignored over 100 internal anti-money laundering alerts, and accepted illegal gratification including luxury electronics and a Rolex watch to hide group borrowings from ...
The Court said that their detention appeared to be illegal in the absence of prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).
The Nagpur bench fined a father-son lawyer duo and referred them to the Bar Council for disciplinary action after finding them guilty of threatening a judicial officer inside an open courtroom.
The Court also expressed serious concern over the rising trend of unauthorised courtroom recordings by public and distorted versions of the same being published on social media.
The affidavit came in response to petitions filed by Congress and Communist Party of India challenging the constitutional validity of the Special Public Security Act.