Search Results

The Court pulled up the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) for passing a cryptic, unreasoned order.

The order has cleared the way for a state‑supervised poll process at the 220‑year‑old research library.

The Court ruled that once the ICC chose to rely on the complainant’s retraction letter, it could not selectively omit the name of the person she had clearly identified as the instigator.

The Court also granted liberty to the bar body to file a petition before the High Court if no action is taken by the government.

The High Court today closed the case against accused Rajendra Chaudhary, Dhan Singh, Manohar Ram Singh Narwaria and Lokesh Sharma and brought the trial against them to an end.

“Quite apparently this public interest litigation is a motivated petition and amounts to an abuse of the process of law,” the Court said.

While granting tax relief to certain sugar exporters, the Court called for uniformity in Central tax litigation and a coherent national litigation framework.

The Court found a real risk of investor deception and directed X, YouTube and domain registrars to act within 36 hours against fake ‘NSE’ handles, channels and websites.

The Court noted lawyers move 50–100 matters daily for mentioning without affidavits, often to simply secure adjournments. The Court called the practice unfair and a burden on the court and registry.

“A matter like this should be resolved. It doesn’t need to escalate into a fight for defamation," Justice Arif Doctor told both parties.

Patil has been accused of making objectionable statements against senior BJP leaders including Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Justice Sharmila Deshmukh said she will pass an order in favour or Aaryan.

The Bench dismissed the gangster's plea seeking sentence reduction and a tentative release date, holding that the 25-year period is yet to be completed.

Justice Deshpande was appointed as an additional judge of the High Court in 2023. She had been given an extension of one year in August 2025.

The Court asked the Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa to act on the issue within four months.

“Unwanted staring, even if accepted as true, is not the same thing as voyeurism within the meaning of Section 354C”, Justice Amit Borkar held.