Search Results

“It is a culture where advocacy is sharp but disciplined, where disagreement does not descend into disrespect and where the dignity of an institution is preserved even in moments of contest or despera ...

The Bench reasoned that interim relief has already been granted in a similar pending tax dispute. The case concerns whether donut sales involve restaurant services or the sale of regular goods for tax ...

The Court refused to quash DV Act proceedings against a man after finding signs of a marriage‑like relationship, but dropped a case against his parents and current wife.

However, the Court said that is not passing any immediate directions to stop the salary and it is only a proposal.

With today's order by Bombay High Court, only lawyer Surendra Gadling would continue to remain in jail.

“He is a cabinet minister and his son is absconding, and police are not able to arrest him,” the judge remarked.

The Court restrained Rita Bhattacharya and media from making defamatory statements about the singer.

Patil was recently stopped at the Mumbai airport and prevented from travelling to London on account of the pending probe.

"It has become regular practice to make allegations against the advocate without making the advocate a party and without taking any action against the advocate," the Court noted.

The Court found that a terrorist gang was formed to avenge the alleged dishonour of their faith by the deceased and to strike terror into the hearts and minds of general public.

The Court warned that focusing only on fair‑trial claims of the accused can leave survivors of sexual assault bewildered and voiceless.

The Court added that such a person cannot be forced to stay back in the protection home merely because she might return to sex work if released without counselling and training.

The ruling was passed on a trademark infringement suit filed by the owner of Shaadi.com against Ammanamanchi Lalitha Rani, an operator of a competing website under the name getshaadi.com.

The submissions cited a case titled Jyoti w/o Dinesh Tulsiani vs Elegant Associates, which the Court and its law clerks were unable to trace.

By late November, the benches of the High Court had more than 100 petitions before them, challenging various aspects of the local body elections.

Similarly, in case any vendor is found with nylon manjha stock, he/she shall be liable to pay a fine of ₹2.5 lakh, the Court further ordered.