Search Results

The Court refused to quash two Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) cases arising from the Yes Bank–IDFC IPO scam against stock-market intermediary Manoj Gokulchand Seksaria.

Justice RI Chagla held that use of the mark outside South India violates a binding consent decree between the The Indian Express and The New Indian Express.

The Court held that such a corporate irregularity does not amount to legal incapacity and cannot be used to derail arbitration once it has commenced.

The Bench found that his family ran multiple real estate, construction and financial-services businesses worth over ₹1,000 crore.

The High Court has also said that recordings will be stored or preserved only when specific directions are issued for the same by the Court.

Shemaroo alleged that Flipkart used its copyrighted content on social media platforms for promotional purposes without permission.

The petitioner, a captain with Akasa Air, was accused by a trainee pilot of making inappropriate remarks and creating discomfort during training.

Citing a 2019 judgment, the Court clarified that hookah can be served as long as it is tobacco-free and the restaurant complies with the provisions of COTPA.

The Court emphasised that quasi-judicial authorities cannot depend blindly on AI-assisted searches or automated results, especially when adjudicating taxpayers’ rights.

This was after the Court said that it was not inclined to pass any ad-interim order.

The dispute arose out of a contract for design and construction of tunnels and stations in the Mumbai Metro Rail project.

The petitioner’s insistence on pressing arguments after being told the matter was not maintainable wasted the court’s time, the Bench noted.

The Court noted that WhiteHat Jr is a subsidiary of Think & Learn, which is presently undergoing insolvency proceedings, leaving the ex-employee in a vulnerable position when it came to the enforcemen ...

While the retired judge will be paid ₹1 lakh per sitting, the other members of the High Power Committee will get ₹55,000.

The Court added that it cannot interfere in such matters, which should be left to the commercial wisdom of banks.

Generali told the Court that the insurer’s confidential and customer data had been hacked and that the unknown perpetrator had demanded USD 500,000 in ransom.