Search Results

In a mixed outcome, the judge partly ruled in favour of Reliance‑backed MMOPL but also struck down several heads of damages against MMRDA for want of evidence.

The Court said these considerations fall outside the limited scope of an enquiry under the Registration Act, 1908.​

The Court was examining orders passed in connection with pre-institution mediation in a dispute between two companies.

The Court found no evidence that the senior citizen had hoisted the flag or inverted the flag; hence, it slammed the magistrate for his “rubber-stamped” cognisance order.

Around 25 people were killed in a fire at Birch by Romeo Lane in Arpora in December 2025.

Justice NR Borkar heard the matter before reserving his judgment in the matter.

The Court held that the ED failed to show any connection between Dewani’s property transactions and the proceeds of crime allegedly generated in the corruption case against Deshmukh.

The Division Bench called the single‑judge's relief to Ambani “perverse” and “illegal."

Sinha was granted an ex parte injunction order protecting his name, image and iconic “Khamosh” dialogue from deepfakes, fake profiles, porn sites and e-commerce misuse till March 30.

The plea has alleged that the move is deliberate, arbitrary and amounts to discrimination against minorities.

The Court interpreted the term ‘any street’ under the MMC Act to include private roads which have been used by public for many years.

The recognition of a single-mother as a complete parent for purposes of a child’s civic identity reflects a movement from patriarchal compulsion to Constitutional choice, the Court said.

The businessman informed the Court he was not in a position to leave as he did not have an active passport.

An RTI response revealed underutilised funds collected from student fees for facilities that were also being rented out for third-party use.

The actor has sued tech giants, e‑commerce sites and John Doe parties over deepfakes, porn and merchandise exploiting his ‘Khamosh’ persona.

The Court observed that the mishap reflected a clear violation of workers’ fundamental rights, and that both the government and the club's owners were responsible for compensating those affected.