kerala high court, transgender pride 
Litigation News

After Kerala High Court push, BCI approves 2 additional seats for transgender students in law colleges

BCI has granted interim approval for the Kerala government's proposal for two supernumerary posts in the 3-year and 5-year LLB courses in law colleges in Kerala for the transgender category for the academic year 2025-26.

Giti Pratap

The Bar Council of India (BCI) on Thursday informed the High Court that it has given its interim approval for the Kerala government's proposal to create two supernumerary posts for transgender students in all law colleges in the State [Esai Clara v. State of Kerala & Ors.].

The move comes following an order passed by the Court on October 24 directing the BCI to approve the Kerala government's request in this regard as final approval for creating new seats rests with the General Council of the BCI. The government had submitted its proposal in August 6.

Justice VG Arun today observed that it was heartening to note that the BCI has taken the necessary action pursuant to the Court's directions.

"It is heartening to note that pursuant to this Court's order dated 24/10/2025, the Bar Council of India, in exercise of its powers concerning standards of legal education and in compliance with the Court's directions, has granted interim approval to the proposal of the Government of Kerala for two supernumerary posts in the 3-year LLB degree course as well as the 5-year integrated LLB programme in each law college in Kerala for the transgender category for the academic year 2025-26," the Court recorded in its order.

Justice VG Arun, Kerala High court

The order was passed on a petition filed by a transgender woman who applied for admission to the integrated five-year LLB Course through the Kerala Law Entrance Examination (KLEE) 2025.

Though she qualified and was included in the rank list, she was denied admission to the Kozhikode Government Law College since no separate category or seat existed for transgender candidates in the central allotment list issued by the Commissioner for Entrance Examinations (CEE).

The petitioner stated that this denial violated her fundamental rights as well as the Supreme Court's directions in the NALSA judgment and the provisions of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019.

The petitioner thus urged the Court to direct the concerned authorities to grant her admission for the year 2025-2026 under the transgender reservation category.

She also sought the implementation of such reservation for transgender persons in all government law colleges across the State and other educational institutions under the government's control.

After being informed about the BCI's decision today, the petitioner's counsel submitted that they would implead all law colleges and universities in the State in the matter as until now it had only added the University of Calicut as a party.

The Court will take up the matter again tomorrow, November 7, to issue directions to the universities.

"Let this be helpful to others also," Justice VG Arun orally remarked.

Advocates Raghul Sudheesh, Unnikrishnan S Thandayaan, Umadevi M, Ambily T Venu and J Lakshmi appeared for the petitioner.

Standing Counsel Rajit appeared for BCI.

State Attorney N Manoj Kumar and Senior Government Pleader PG Pramod represented the State.

IndiGo and Mahindra gear up for legal battle in Delhi High Court over ‘6E’ mark after mediation fails

Nicholas Underhill, Peter Goldsmith KC to return to Fountain Court Chambers

How SIM-based tracking is the next step for logistics in India: Legal landscape, compliance obligations, and strategic edge

Recalibrating the expanding scope of personality rights in India: Constitutional dimensions and the path forward

Delhi HC tells police to promptly decide ex-DUSU President Ronak Khatri's plea for protection over life threats

SCROLL FOR NEXT