Delhi High Court, Ozempic 
Litigation News

Dr Reddy’s tells Delhi HC it will not launch oral diabetes drug within Novo Nordisk patent range

Novo Nordisk moved the Court claiming that Dr Reddy’s oral semaglutide products infringe its patent covering a specific formulation of the drug.

Bar & Bench

Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories on Tuesday told the Delhi High Court that it will not commercially manufacture or sell oral tablet Semaglutide falling within the patented range claimed by Novo Nordisk [Novo Nordisk Vs Dr Reddy's].

The assurance was given before Justice Tushar Rao Gedela during the hearing a suit filed by Novo Nordisk alleging patent infringement of its oral semaglutide formulations. The drug is used to manage type 2 diabetes.

"The defendant has agreed not to commercially manufacture, sale, supply/export, offer for sale Semaglutide (Oral Tablet), comprising Semaglutide and salt(s) of N-(8-(2-hydroxybenzoyl)amino)caprylic acid (NAC), wherein the amount of said salt(s) of N-(8-(2-hydroxybenzoyl)amino)caprylic acid is in the range of 0.6 - 2.1 mmol; wherein the amount of the GLP-1 agonist Semaglutide is in the range of 0.01 mg to 100 mg as claimed under Claim 1 of the plaintiffs’ patent no.IN 325669," the Bench recorded in the order.

Justice Tushar Rao Gedela

Novo Nordisk moved the Court claiming that Dr Reddy’s proposed oral semaglutide products infringe its patent covering a specific formulation of the drug.

During the hearing of its plea on Tuesday, counsel for Dr Reddy’s submitted that the company is not infringing the patent, as its product does not fall within the claimed range. It was further submitted that it would not commercially manufacture or sell oral semaglutide products covered by Novo Nordisk’s patent.

As part of the arrangement, Dr Reddy’s agreed to provide advance samples of its proposed products under the brand names “OBEDA” and “MASHLO”, to Novo Nordisk before any commercial launch.

Novo Nordisk, in turn, assured that any technical data generated from testing these samples will be kept confidential.

"The plaintiffs undertake that the Technical Data/Report arrived at and submitted after the aforesaid samples are tested, shall be kept confidential and not be revealed to any person and would be strictly used for the purpose of this Suit," the Court recorded in the order.

The Court also issued summons in the suit to Dr Reddy’s. The company was been directed to file its written statement within 30 days.

The case will now be heard on April 24.

Novo Nordisk was represented by Senior Advocates Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Amit Sibal with advocates Hemant Singh, Mamta Jha, Rishabh Paliwal, Shreyansh Gupta, Sanchit Sharma, Saksham Dhingra, Smriti Nair, Ankit Handa and Amit Bhandari from Inttl Advocare.

Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Amit Sibal

Dr Reddy's was represented by Senior Advocates Dayan Krishnan and J Sai Deepak with advocates Sidhant Goel, Mohit Goel, Aditya Goel, Deepankar Mishra and Kartikeya Tandon from Sim & San.

Senior Advocate Dayan Krishnan

[Read Order]

Novo Nordisk Vs Dr Reddy's.pdf
Preview

Old Monk sale ban has cost Maharashtra ₹350 crore in revenue: Company tells Bombay High Court

Karnataka High Court strikes down law enhancing SC/ST reservation as total quota exceeds 50% cap

Here are the ten directions Rahul Gandhi has sought from Supreme Court in his petition on SIR

DVAC cannot claim blanket exemption from RTI Act in corruption cases: Madras High Court

Delhi protests: Contempt of court plea filed in Supreme Court over police detention of journalists

SCROLL FOR NEXT