Rahul Gandhi Facebook
News

Madhya Pradesh High Court closes defamation case against Rahul Gandhi after he expresses regret

Gandhi had made the alleged defamatory statement during the campaigning for 2018 Assembly Elections in Madhya Pradesh.

Bar & Bench

The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Thursday closed defamation procedures initiated against Congress Leader Rahul Gandhi by Union Minister and Former Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan’s son Kartikey Singh Chauhan [Rahul Gandhi v. Kartikey Singh Chauhan]

Kartikey Singh Chauhan had filed the defamation complaint before a trial court after Gandhi allegedly linked him to the Panama Papers controversy in 2018.

Today, Justice Pramod Kumar Agrawal closed the proceedings after Gandhi expressed regret over his statement and said that soon after publication of the alleged defamatory statement, he had issued a clarification.

The Court also took into account Kartikey Singh Chauhan’s statement that he would not like to escalate the matter further after Gandhi’s regret. 

Considering the statement of applicant mentioned in I.A. No. 14821/2026 and the reply filed to the aforesaid IA as well as arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the sides wherein regret has been expressed by applicant, the proceedings before this Court are closed and proceedings pending before the JMFC, Special Judge (MP & MLA) complaint case no. SCPPM No. 03/2018 Bhopal shall also stand closed,” the Court ordered.

Justice Pramod Kumar Agrawal

Gandhi had made the alleged statement during the campaigning for 2018 Assembly Elections in Madhya Pradesh. He later clarified that he intended to refer to the son of the former Chief Minister of Chhattisgarh and not Madhya Pradesh. 

Senior Advocates Vivek Krishna Tankha and Ajay Gupta with Advocates Aishwarya Sahu and Rajeev Mishra represented Gandhi.

Advocate Sankalp Kochar represented the respondent Kartikey Singh Chauhan.

[Read Order]

Rahul Gandhi v. Kartikey Singh Chauhan.pdf
Preview

From separation to judgment: Which financial reality should count for maintenance/alimony?

Karnataka High Court cancels anticipatory bail granted to Vachanananda Swamiji in POCSO case

Brothers of deceased can claim motor accident compensation even if not dependent on victim: Gujarat HC

Trilegal, AZB, Latham, SAM, CMS INDUSLAW act on CRED securing $900 million from Meta

Samay Raina’s India’s Got Latent returns: Meet the 11-lawyer legal team backing the show

SCROLL FOR NEXT