Lawyers  
News

Supreme Court urges BCI to consider reservation in bar bodies for lawyers with disabilities

The Court said that it cannot pass an order to implement such reservations, but urged the BCI to consider the issue.

Bar & Bench

The Supreme Court on November 3 directed the Bar Council of India (BCI) to consider whether posts can be reserved in Bar Councils and Bar Associations for lawyers with disabilities [Amit Kumar Yadav v. Bar Council of India and anr].

The Bench of Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and Joymalya Bagchi issued the direction while dealing with a plea filed by lawyer Amit Kumar Yadav.

Yadav had urged the Court to direct the BCI and the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh to reserve some posts in Bar bodies for practicing advocates with disabilities.

The Court, however, refused to issue any such direction after noting that the State Bar Council elections in Uttar Pradesh have already been notified.

"At this stage, it seems difficult for this Court to interfere and issue a positive mandamus for providing the reservation that is sought," the Court said.

However, it asked the BCI to take a call on this issue after noting that it was essentially a question of policy.

"However, the reservation for persons with disability essentially being a policy matter, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the Bar Council of India to consider the cause espoused by the petitioner in light of the relevant legislative policies and statutes emanating from the constitutional principles of equality," the November 3 order said.

The Court added that it is open for the concerned stakeholders to take an appropriate decision in the matter. With these directions, it closed Yadav's plea.

Advocates Asif Iqbal, Iqbal Ahmed, Atul Kumar Srivastav, Anu Priya Nisha Minz and Siddhartha Sinha appeared for the petitioner.

[Read Order]

Amit Kumar Yadav v. Bar Council of India and anr.pdf
Preview

Justice Sandeep Bhatt takes oath as Madhya Pradesh High Court judge

SP vs. DSP in rape on promise to marry case: Why Supreme Court said parties should have seen astrologer first

Kerala High Court initiates contempt case against man who forged ex-wife's signature to file cases

Delhi High Court flags 'disturbing trend' of media reporting innocuous remarks by judges

Renukaswamy murder case: Bengaluru court frames criminal charges against 17 including actor Darshan, Pavithra Gowda

SCROLL FOR NEXT