A summary of the important cases from the causelist of the Delhi High Court. .LIST OF CASES.Khushboo Aggarwal & Anr Vs. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India & Anr.Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi v Union of India, Rajendra Prashad v Govt of NCT of Delhi, MA Usmani v Union of India & Ors, Naresh Kumar v Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.Child Health Organization v University of DelhiIndian Optometry Federation v Union of India.IPR Cases [Anand & Anand].Super Cassettes Industries v Haridwar Cable Network [Connected cases]Banyan Tree Holding (P) Ltd v Mr. Jamshyad Sethna & Anr..SUMMARY OF CASES.1. Khushboo Aggarwal & Anr Vs. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India & Anr..[Item 23, Court 1- W.P.(C) 171/2016].Bench- Chief Justice G Rohini, Jayant Nath J..Petition challenging the second part of the TRAI notification on call drops which made it mandatory for the telecom companies to notify customers on dropped calls..Today in Court- In light of the Supreme Court judgment on call drops, the Bench dismissed this case as infructuous..2. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi v Union of India, Rajendra Prashad v Govt of NCT of Delhi, MA Usmani v Union of India & Ors, Naresh Kumar v Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors..[Item 24-33, Court 1].Bench: Chief Justice G Rohini, Jayant Nath J..A batch of petitions questioning the apportionment of powers between the Chief Minister and Lt-Governor..Today in Court- Senior Advocate Indira Jaising argued for the Delhi Government today after which the Bench adjourned the case..3. Child Health Organization v University of Delhi .[Item 38, Court 1- W.P.(C) 4786/2016].Bench: Chief Justice G Rohini, Jayant Nath J..A fresh petition. Check evening updates..Today in Court- This case pertained to admissions made under sports quota in the Delhi University and pointed out certain discrepancies in the procedure..The Bench directed the Delhi University counsel to file a reply on the current procedure followed by the University of admitting students under the sports quota. The case has been adjourned to August 17..4. Indian Optometry Federation v Union of India.[Item 6, Court 1- W.P.(C) 4731/2016].Bench- Chief Justice G Rohini, Jayant Nath J..Check evening updates..Today in Court- Case pertains to directions against online marketing companies selling lenses & other optometry instruments without medical examination and proper prescription. The Bench directed the Union to file its reply in this regard and adjourned the case to August 29..IPR Cases [Anand & Anand].5. Super Cassettes Industries v Haridwar Cable Network [Connected cases].[Item 1-3 and 14-20, Court 24].Bench- Vipin Sanghi J..Check evening updates..Today in Court- This case could not be tracked. Any leads/inputs would be appreciated..6. Banyan Tree Holding (P) Ltd v Mr. Jamshyad Sethna & Anr. .[Item 4, Court 22- CS(OS) 2172/2007].Bench- Valmiki Mehta J..Check evening updates..Today in Court- The counsel for both sides informed the Bench that a proposed settlement had been exchanged between both parties and the same had to be filed with a joint application of settlement. The Bench directed for the settlement deed to be filed within four weeks, albeit with a cost amount of Rs. 10, 000 to be deposited along with the deed..The case will now be heard in September.
A summary of the important cases from the causelist of the Delhi High Court. .LIST OF CASES.Khushboo Aggarwal & Anr Vs. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India & Anr.Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi v Union of India, Rajendra Prashad v Govt of NCT of Delhi, MA Usmani v Union of India & Ors, Naresh Kumar v Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.Child Health Organization v University of DelhiIndian Optometry Federation v Union of India.IPR Cases [Anand & Anand].Super Cassettes Industries v Haridwar Cable Network [Connected cases]Banyan Tree Holding (P) Ltd v Mr. Jamshyad Sethna & Anr..SUMMARY OF CASES.1. Khushboo Aggarwal & Anr Vs. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India & Anr..[Item 23, Court 1- W.P.(C) 171/2016].Bench- Chief Justice G Rohini, Jayant Nath J..Petition challenging the second part of the TRAI notification on call drops which made it mandatory for the telecom companies to notify customers on dropped calls..Today in Court- In light of the Supreme Court judgment on call drops, the Bench dismissed this case as infructuous..2. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi v Union of India, Rajendra Prashad v Govt of NCT of Delhi, MA Usmani v Union of India & Ors, Naresh Kumar v Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors..[Item 24-33, Court 1].Bench: Chief Justice G Rohini, Jayant Nath J..A batch of petitions questioning the apportionment of powers between the Chief Minister and Lt-Governor..Today in Court- Senior Advocate Indira Jaising argued for the Delhi Government today after which the Bench adjourned the case..3. Child Health Organization v University of Delhi .[Item 38, Court 1- W.P.(C) 4786/2016].Bench: Chief Justice G Rohini, Jayant Nath J..A fresh petition. Check evening updates..Today in Court- This case pertained to admissions made under sports quota in the Delhi University and pointed out certain discrepancies in the procedure..The Bench directed the Delhi University counsel to file a reply on the current procedure followed by the University of admitting students under the sports quota. The case has been adjourned to August 17..4. Indian Optometry Federation v Union of India.[Item 6, Court 1- W.P.(C) 4731/2016].Bench- Chief Justice G Rohini, Jayant Nath J..Check evening updates..Today in Court- Case pertains to directions against online marketing companies selling lenses & other optometry instruments without medical examination and proper prescription. The Bench directed the Union to file its reply in this regard and adjourned the case to August 29..IPR Cases [Anand & Anand].5. Super Cassettes Industries v Haridwar Cable Network [Connected cases].[Item 1-3 and 14-20, Court 24].Bench- Vipin Sanghi J..Check evening updates..Today in Court- This case could not be tracked. Any leads/inputs would be appreciated..6. Banyan Tree Holding (P) Ltd v Mr. Jamshyad Sethna & Anr. .[Item 4, Court 22- CS(OS) 2172/2007].Bench- Valmiki Mehta J..Check evening updates..Today in Court- The counsel for both sides informed the Bench that a proposed settlement had been exchanged between both parties and the same had to be filed with a joint application of settlement. The Bench directed for the settlement deed to be filed within four weeks, albeit with a cost amount of Rs. 10, 000 to be deposited along with the deed..The case will now be heard in September.
