<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>A summary of the important cases from the causelists of the Delhi High Court. </em></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>LIST OF CASES</strong></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #993366;"><strong>Delhi High Court</strong></span></p>.<ul style="text-align: justify;"><li style="text-align: justify;">Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd & Anr v Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd & Anr. v Telecom Regulatory Authority of India</li><li style="text-align: justify;">Pfizer Ltd & Anr Vs Union of India & Anr and Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Ltd Vs Drugs Controller General of India & Anr. [Batch matters]</li><li style="text-align: justify;">Kal Airways Pvt Ltd Vs Spicejet Ltd & Anr and Kalanithi Maran Vs Spicejet Ltd & Anr.</li><li style="text-align: justify;">Virbhadra Singh v Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate & Anr.</li><li style="text-align: justify;">The Registrar, Supreme Court of India v RS Misra & Ors.</li></ul>.<p><strong>SUMMARY OF CASES</strong></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><em><strong>1. Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd & Anr Vs Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd & Anr. v Telecom Regulatory Authority of India</strong></em></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>[Item 16-18, Court 1- W.P.(C) 10985/2015 & W.P.(C) 10986/2015]</strong></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Bench: Chief Justice G Rohini, Jayant Nath J.</strong></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">Petitions filed by both companies challenging a TRAI Regulation on interconnection usage charges that was aimed at lowering call rates.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #993366;"><strong>Today in Court-</strong></span> This case could not be tracked. Any leads/inputs would be appreciated.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><b><i>2. Pfizer Ltd & Anr Vs Union of India & Anr and Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Ltd Vs Drugs Controller General of India & Anr. [Batch matters]</i></b></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>[Items 66-451, Court 12]</strong></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Bench: RS Endlaw J.</strong></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">Petitions challenging the Govt’s notification banning FDC drugs.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #993366;"><strong>Today in Court-</strong></span> This case could not be tracked. Any leads/inputs would be appreciated.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><b><i>3. Kal Airways Pvt Ltd Vs Spicejet Ltd & Anr and Kalanithi Maran Vs Spicejet Ltd & Anr. </i></b></p>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><strong>[Item 106-107, Court 23]</strong></div>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Bench- Manmohan Singh J. </strong></div>.<div style="text-align: justify;">Share transfer dispute between SpiceJet Airlines and Kalanithi Maran.</div>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #993366;"><strong>Today in Court-</strong></span> The Bench reserved its orders.</div>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><hr /><p><em><strong>4. Virbhadra Singh v Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate & Anr. </strong></em></p></div>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><strong>[Item 4, Court 10-W.P.(C) 4501/2016]</strong></div>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Bench-Manmohan J.</strong></div>.<div style="text-align: justify;">Check evening updates.</div>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #993366;"><strong>Today in Court-</strong></span> This case could not be tracked. Any leads/inputs would be appreciated.</div>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><em><strong>5. </strong><strong><em>The R</em>egistrar, Supreme Court of India v RS Misra & Ors. </strong></em></div>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><p> <strong>[Item 15, Court 10- W.P.(C) 3530/2011]</strong></p><p><strong>Bench- Manmohan J.</strong></p><p>Check evening updates.</p><p><span style="color: #993366;"><strong>Today in Court-</strong></span> This case could not be tracked. Any leads/inputs would be appreciated.</p></div>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>A summary of the important cases from the causelists of the Delhi High Court. </em></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>LIST OF CASES</strong></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #993366;"><strong>Delhi High Court</strong></span></p>.<ul style="text-align: justify;"><li style="text-align: justify;">Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd & Anr v Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd & Anr. v Telecom Regulatory Authority of India</li><li style="text-align: justify;">Pfizer Ltd & Anr Vs Union of India & Anr and Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Ltd Vs Drugs Controller General of India & Anr. [Batch matters]</li><li style="text-align: justify;">Kal Airways Pvt Ltd Vs Spicejet Ltd & Anr and Kalanithi Maran Vs Spicejet Ltd & Anr.</li><li style="text-align: justify;">Virbhadra Singh v Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate & Anr.</li><li style="text-align: justify;">The Registrar, Supreme Court of India v RS Misra & Ors.</li></ul>.<p><strong>SUMMARY OF CASES</strong></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><em><strong>1. Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd & Anr Vs Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd & Anr. v Telecom Regulatory Authority of India</strong></em></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>[Item 16-18, Court 1- W.P.(C) 10985/2015 & W.P.(C) 10986/2015]</strong></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Bench: Chief Justice G Rohini, Jayant Nath J.</strong></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">Petitions filed by both companies challenging a TRAI Regulation on interconnection usage charges that was aimed at lowering call rates.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #993366;"><strong>Today in Court-</strong></span> This case could not be tracked. Any leads/inputs would be appreciated.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><b><i>2. Pfizer Ltd & Anr Vs Union of India & Anr and Laborate Pharmaceuticals India Ltd Vs Drugs Controller General of India & Anr. [Batch matters]</i></b></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>[Items 66-451, Court 12]</strong></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Bench: RS Endlaw J.</strong></p>.<p style="text-align: justify;">Petitions challenging the Govt’s notification banning FDC drugs.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #993366;"><strong>Today in Court-</strong></span> This case could not be tracked. Any leads/inputs would be appreciated.</p>.<p style="text-align: justify;"><b><i>3. Kal Airways Pvt Ltd Vs Spicejet Ltd & Anr and Kalanithi Maran Vs Spicejet Ltd & Anr. </i></b></p>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><strong>[Item 106-107, Court 23]</strong></div>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Bench- Manmohan Singh J. </strong></div>.<div style="text-align: justify;">Share transfer dispute between SpiceJet Airlines and Kalanithi Maran.</div>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #993366;"><strong>Today in Court-</strong></span> The Bench reserved its orders.</div>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><hr /><p><em><strong>4. Virbhadra Singh v Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate & Anr. </strong></em></p></div>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><strong>[Item 4, Court 10-W.P.(C) 4501/2016]</strong></div>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Bench-Manmohan J.</strong></div>.<div style="text-align: justify;">Check evening updates.</div>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: #993366;"><strong>Today in Court-</strong></span> This case could not be tracked. Any leads/inputs would be appreciated.</div>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><em><strong>5. </strong><strong><em>The R</em>egistrar, Supreme Court of India v RS Misra & Ors. </strong></em></div>.<div style="text-align: justify;"><p> <strong>[Item 15, Court 10- W.P.(C) 3530/2011]</strong></p><p><strong>Bench- Manmohan J.</strong></p><p>Check evening updates.</p><p><span style="color: #993366;"><strong>Today in Court-</strong></span> This case could not be tracked. Any leads/inputs would be appreciated.</p></div>
