- Apprentice Lawyer
- Legal Jobs
The dispute concerned whether the lawyer's chamber was liable to be charged with electricity tariff on commercial basis.
The Calcutta High Court recently highlighted that when a litigating lawyer uses his residential space to establish his chambers, the space cannot be categorised as a commercial use. This unlike law firms that use commercial spaces to carry out their work, the Court held.
The Court was called to make the distinction while deciding whether a residential space used by a lawyer for his legal chambers would come under a domestic or commercial category for the purpose of levying electricity tariffs.
The petitioner had filed a writ petition before the Calcutta High Court when his request to receive a new electric connection for his chalmber under the "domestic (urban)" category was not fulfilled by CESC Limited.
The petitioner was a practicing lawyer who had set up his chamber on the ground floor of a multi-storied building where he resides. Instead of a domestic (urban), he received a quotation from CESC Limited for payment of service charges and security deposit on the basis of a "commercial (urban)" connection. After the CESC did not reply to a representation he made registering his protest over the same, the petitioner moved the High Court in a writ plea.