Judicial officers declared frontline workers for priority COVID-19 vaccination: Delhi govt tells Delhi High Court

The Delhi government on Thursday told the Delhi High Court that it has declared judicial officers as frontline workers for conferring them the benefit of COVID-19 vaccination on priority (Delhi Judicial Officers Association v GNCTD). .A Division Bench of Justices Vipin Sanghi and Jasmeet Singh also took on record government's stand that as and when any other benefits are extended to frontline workers, judicial officers shall be considered for the same. .The development came after the Court, last week, lamented the death of three judicial officers due to COVID, and asked the State government to consider whether judicial officers presiding over lower courts can be declared as frontline workers..The Court was hearing a plea moved by the Delhi Judicial Officers Association raising concerns with respect to the health facilities at their disposal..On the issue of ex-gratia compensation, Senior Advocate Dayan Krishnan, who appeared for the Association, said that the same is under consideration by the Delhi government. ."I'm sure government will look at this positively. Government is looking into it," he said. .Krishnan further informed the Court that pursuant to the Court's order, the Principal Secretary (law), Delhi government had been appointed as central nodal officer to address the medical needs of judicial officers suffering from COVID19. .He also stated that the committee appointed by the Chief Justice of the High Court, headed by Justice Mukta Gupta and comprising Justices Navin Chawla and Prathiba M Singh had issued directions in relation to expenditure incurred on treatment of judicial officers. ."We trust the Committee. It is taking pro active steps," Krisnan told the Court. .The Court noted that the decisions taken by this Committee pertained to court staff of the High Court and district courts as well. .Advocate Tanvir Ahmed Mir, who had also preferred a petition similar to that of the Association, urged the Court to consider passing directions for reimbursement of expenditure incurred by judicial officers in non-empallened hospitals..The Court, however, refused to pass any "blanket order" on reimbursement at this stage and clarified that such an exercise had to be done on a case-to-case basis. .The Court observed that there were case laws on reimbursement of medical expenses for government officers in case of non-empanelled hospitals. "We expect State will act reasonably.. some dispute may be there. Those are specific instances that have to be dealt with..We've told you there can't be a blanket order.. why should we assume it won't be done..it would be premature for us to pass an order directing the govt to clear all claims. Each claim has to be examined," it said. .Senior Advocate Rahul Mehra, appearing for Delhi government, informed that there was a system in place to deal with the issue reimbursement and claims of judicial officers also would be decided accordingly. .In view of these developments, the Court disposed of the petitions with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Court again in case of issues in the future..Follow Bar and Bench channel on WhatsAppDownload the Bar and Bench Mobile app for instant access to the latest legal news.