[Sabarimala] Not necessary to refer to facts to decide pure question of law: SC explains why question of law can be referred to larger Bench
A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court today gave a detailed explanation for its February 10 order by which it held that questions of law can indeed be referred to a larger bench. (Kantara Rajeevaru v. Indian Young Lawyers Association and ors - Supreme Court Order - May 11)
This order was passed in the review petitions filed against the Apex Court's November 2019 decision to allow entry of women into the Sabarimala Temple.
We’re glad you’re enjoying this story. Subscribe to any of our plans to continue reading the story.