- Apprentice Lawyer
- Legal Jobs
The Supreme Court stated that the plea could not have been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, which is primarily invoked on the violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution.
A petition filed in the Supreme Court stating that the government has remained a mute spectator to the hardships faced by lawyers during the COVID-19 lockdown was dismissed after the Court observed that the petition could not be filed invoking Article 32 of the Constitution.
The plea by Advocate Abhinav Ramkrishna had urged the Court to issue directions so that the government, in tandem with state Bar councils, formulates a uniform welfare scheme for all lawyers affected by the lockdown.
The petitioner highlighted that lawyers were finding it difficult to sustain themselves in the wake of the closure of Courts.
"The government, Bar council of India and state bar councils cannot be expected to be in a state of deep slumber or be insensitive towards the economic and mental hardship faced by lawyers, except few upon who have achieved a milestone by dint of their hard work and acumen", the petition stated.
However, a three judge bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan stated that the plea could not have been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, which is primarily invoked on the violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution.
The petition had stated that while the Bar Council of India (BCI) on April 23 had announced a financial scheme for lawyers, "the same serves no purpose as the amount to be disbursed has been kept undecided."